Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25218442›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology2015

Biological messiness vs. biological genius: Mechanistic aspects and roles of protein promiscuity.

William M Atkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Network Medicine in Pathobiology.The American journal of pathology · 2019
    Review
  13. ProtMiscuity: a database of promiscuous proteins.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William M AtkinsDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Box 357610, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7610, USA. Electronic address: winky@u.washington.edu.

Funding

P450-Base Drug Interactions with Low Spin DrugsR01GM110790 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, WILLIAM M · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to the traditional biological paradigms focused on 'specificity', recent research and theoretical efforts have focused on functional 'promiscuity' exhibited by proteins and enzymes in many biological settings, including enzymatic detoxication, steroid biochemistry, signal transduction and immune responses. In addition, divergent evolutionary processes are apparently facilitated by random mutations that yield promiscuous enzyme intermediates. The intermediates, in turn, provide opportunities for further evolution to optimize new functions from existing protein scaffolds. In some cases, promiscuity may simply represent the inherent plasticity of proteins resulting from their polymeric nature with distributed conformational ensembles. Enzymes or proteins that bind or metabolize noncognate substrates create 'messiness' or noise in the systems they contribute to. With our increasing awareness of the frequency of these promiscuous behaviors it becomes interesting and important to understand the molecular bases for promiscuous behavior and to distinguish between evolutionarily selected promiscuity and evolutionarily tolerated messiness. This review provides an overview of current understanding of these aspects of protein biochemistry and enzymology.

Indexed as

EnzymesProteinsSubstrate SpecificityEnzymesProteinsDetoxication enzymesEnzyme evolutionEnzyme promiscuityEvolvabilityIntrinsically Disordered proteins

Identifiers

PMID25218442
PMCPMC4920067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.