ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2014
Predicting evolutionary site variability from structure in viral proteins: buriedness, packing, flexibility, and design.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to frustrate a plant pathogen.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Review
- Multiple molecular and cellular properties jointly affect protein and site-specific evolutionary rates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Insertion-Deletion Events Are Depleted in Protein Regions with Predicted Secondary Structure.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Evolution of tunnels in α/β-hydrolase fold proteins-What can we learn from studying epoxide hydrolases?PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Evolution of Amino Acid Propensities under Stability-Mediated Epistasis.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Hotspots for mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein: a correspondence analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Emerging Frontiers in the Study of Molecular Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020Article
- Dynamics-function relationship in the catalytic domains of N-terminal acetyltransferases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- Sequence-structure-function relationships in class I MHC: A local frustration perspective.PloS one · 2020Article
- Beyond Thermodynamic Constraints: Evolutionary Sampling Generates Realistic Protein Sequence Variation.Genetics · 2018Article
- Experimental Determination and Prediction of the Fitness Effects of Random Point Mutations in the Biosynthetic Enzyme HisA.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Identification of positive selection in genes is greatly improved by using experimentally informed site-specific models.Biology direct · 2017Article
- Measuring evolutionary rates of proteins in a structural context.F1000Research · 2017Article
- Computational prediction of the tolerance to amino-acid deletion in green-fluorescent protein.PloS one · 2017Article
- Calculating site-specific evolutionary rates at the amino-acid or codon level yields similar rate estimates.PeerJ · 2017Article
- Intermediate divergence levels maximize the strength of structure-sequence correlations in enzymes and viral proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016Article
- Optimization of Conformational Dynamics in an Epistatic Evolutionary Trajectory.Molecular biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Identification of Novel N-Glycosylation Sites at Noncanonical Protein Consensus Motifs.Journal of proteome research · 2016Article
- Dissecting the roles of local packing density and longer-range effects in protein sequence evolution.Proteins · 2016Article
- Functional Sites Induce Long-Range Evolutionary Constraints in Enzymes.PLoS biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several recent works have shown that protein structure can predict site-specific evolutionary sequence variation. In particular, sites that are buried and/or have many contacts with other sites in a structure have been shown to evolve more slowly, on average, than surface sites with few contacts. Here, we present a comprehensive study of the extent to which numerous structural properties can predict sequence variation. The quantities we considered include buriedness (as measured by relative solvent accessibility), packing density (as measured by contact number), structural flexibility (as measured by B factors, root-mean-square fluctuations, and variation in dihedral angles), and variability in designed structures. We obtained structural flexibility measures both from molecular dynamics simulations performed on nine non-homologous viral protein structures and from variation in homologous variants of those proteins, where they were available. We obtained measures of variability in designed structures from flexible-backbone design in the Rosetta software. We found that most of the structural properties correlate with site variation in the majority of structures, though the correlations are generally weak (correlation coefficients of 0.1-0.4). Moreover, we found that buriedness and packing density were better predictors of evolutionary variation than structural flexibility. Finally, variability in designed structures was a weaker predictor of evolutionary variability than buriedness or packing density, but it was comparable in its predictive power to the best structural flexibility measures. We conclude that simple measures of buriedness and packing density are better predictors of evolutionary variation than the more complicated predictors obtained from dynamic simulations, ensembles of homologous structures, or computational protein design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.