ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
ERCC1 and the efficacy of cisplatin in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- mAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- SET and MYND domain-containing protein 3 inhibits tumor cell sensitivity to cisplatin.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Enhanced antitumor efficacy of cisplatin for treating ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo via transferrin binding.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- ERCC1_202 Is A Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.Journal of Cancer · 2017Article
- 18F-fludrodeoxyglucose maximal standardized uptake value and metabolic tumor burden are associated with major chemotherapy-related tumor markers in NSCLC patients.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) protein is proposed as a predictor for cisplatin efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, recent studies declare that ERCC1 is not associated with the response of platinum-based chemotherapy or clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to assess whether ERCC1 expression level is linked to cisplatin sensitivity and clinical outcomes in resected NSCLC patients. Paraffin-embedded cancer samples from 112 patients were used for immunohistochemical staining. Cancer cells isolated from fresh tumor tissues were used to determine the sensitivity to cisplatin by MTT assay. The association between ERCC1 expression and cisplatin sensitivity was tested by Spearman's rho test. The correlation of ERCC1 expression with clinicopathologic parameters was evaluated by the chi-square tests. The relationship between variables and survival was assessed by log-rank test. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis of survival. ERCC1 expression was significantly correlated with the sensitivity of cisplatin in vitro (p < 0.01, r = 0.37). ERCC1 was not associated with OS (p = 0.17) or DFS (p = 0.13) in patients with resected NSCLC. ERCC1 is not a sensible marker for the choice of treatment in clinical patients with resected NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.