Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25217311›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015

Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Chun Hoi Yan, Kwong Yuen Chiu, Fu Yuen Ng, Ping Keung Chan, Christian Xinshuo Fang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04748016 (Sterilised 3D-PRINTed Bone Models in Addition to Conventional CT Imaging for Operative Visualisation in Complex Intra-articular Fracture Repair - A Multi-centre, Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04748016 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Sterilised 3D-PRINTed Bone Models in Addition to Conventional CT Imaging for Operative Visualisation in Complex Intra-articular Fracture Repair - A Multi-centre, Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2020 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsDistal Humerus Fracture, Distal Femur Fracture, Distal Tibia Fracture, Proximal Humeral FractureArms3D printed (3DP) bone models + CT imaging, CT imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. No improvement in reducing outliers in coronal axis alignment with patient-specific instrumentation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Trial
  12. The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Trial
  13. Tourniquet application during TKA did not affect the accuracy of implant positioning: a randomized clinical trial.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Trial
  14. PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chun Hoi YanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 5/F, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China. yanchunhoi@gmail.com.
Kwong Yuen ChiuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 5/F, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Fu Yuen NgDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 5/F, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ping Keung ChanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 5/F, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Christian Xinshuo FangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 5/F, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current study investigated the accuracy in achieving proper lower limb alignment and individual component positions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with 3 different instrumentation techniques. It was hypothesized that patient-specific instruments (PSI) would achieve more accurate lower limb alignment and component positions compared to conventional instruments (CON).

methodsNinety knees in 81 patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio into CON, computer navigation (NAV) and PSI groups to receive TKA. The surgical routines were standardized. The lower limb mechanical axis and individual component positions were assessed on standard radiographs. Tourniquet time, operation time and patients' functional scores were documented.

resultsConventional instruments and PSI were more likely to result in an excessively flexed femoral component (p = 0.001) compared to NAV. Number of outliers in postoperative lower limb alignment, and other components positions in the coronal and sagittal plane showed no statistically significant difference. The mean tourniquet time and operation time was significantly shorter in CON and PSI groups than NAV group (p < 0.001). Four early complications occurred in the PSI group (p = 0.015). At 3-month follow-up, there was no difference in terms of the knee range of motion and patients' function among the 3 groups.

conclusionNo significant radiological and clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CON or NAV in TKA. Routine use of PSI is not recommended because of the extra cost and waiting time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative PeriodRange of Motion, ArticularSurgery, Computer-AssistedComponent positionComputer navigationFunctional outcomesLower limb alignmentPatient-specific instrumentationTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.