Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25217189›Full record

SynthesisLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2014

Systematic review of response rates of sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesotheliomas in clinical trials.

Aaron S Mansfield, James T Symanowski, Tobias Peikert

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  3. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, Version 3.2016.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2016
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Pleural mesothelioma classification-update and challenges.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron S MansfieldDepartment of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. Electronic address: mansfield.aaron@mayo.edu.
James T SymanowskiDepartment of Cancer Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States.
Tobias PeikertDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Carolinas Healthcare System · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
Anti-Tumor Immunity in Response to a Modified Vaccine Strain Measles VirusK23CA159391 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PEIKERT, TOBIAS · 2012 to 2015
$657k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NCI NIH HHS K23 CA159391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMalignant pleural mesothelioma is an almost universally fatal malignancy primarily related to asbestos exposure. Based on the differences in immunologic markers and gene expression between histologic subtypes of mesothelioma, and our clinical impression that response rates vary by histology, we decided to examine the reported response rates of mesothelioma subtypes.

objectivesOur objective was to compare the response rates of sarcomatoid mesotheliomas to the overall response rates in published clinical trials.

methodsWe searched PubMed for "mesothelioma" with the clinical trials filter selected. We included articles published between January 1, 2000 and March 20, 2014 in which subjects received first or second line systemic therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Studies investigating multi-modality therapy including surgery were excluded. Response rates [including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)] were estimated for the entire patient cohort and then separately for subjects with sarcomatoid tumors. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsWe reviewed 544 publications of which 41 trials met our inclusion criteria. Eleven of these trials did not include patients with sarcomatoid mesothelioma (27% of eligible studies). The remaining 30 publications included 1475 subjects, 1011 with epithelioid tumors (68.5%), 203 with biphasic tumors (13.8%), 137 with sarcomatoid tumors (9.3%) and 124 with unknown subtypes (8.4%). In total, there were 323 responses (21.9%, complete and partial responses, 95% CI: 16.3, 28.8) to systemic therapy across all histological subtypes. In patients with sarcomatoid tumors (n=137) 19 responses were observed. This accounted for 5.9% of all responses and yields a 13.9% (95% CI: 8.6, 21.6) response rate for patients with sarcomatoid tumors. Multiple biases likely affected this systematic review.

conclusionResponse rates for different histological subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma are infrequently reported. Partial and complete responses to systemic therapies appear to be less common among patients with sarcomatoid tumors.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyHumansLung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantPleural NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeEpithelioidMesotheliomaResponse ratesSarcomatoidSystematic reviewTumor

Identifiers

PMID25217189
PMCPMC4254081
OpenAlexW2003045761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.