Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25217146›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2014

Early therapy with IgM-enriched polyclonal immunoglobulin in patients with septic shock.

Ilaria Cavazzuti, Giulia Serafini, Stefano Busani, Laura Rinaldi, Emanuela Biagioni, Marta Buoncristiano, Massimo Girardis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03334006 (Prospective, Randomized Trial of Personalized Medicine With Pentaglobin® After Surgical Infectious Source Control in Patients With Peritonitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03334006 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Randomized Trial of Personalized Medicine With Pentaglobin® After Surgical Infectious Source Control in Patients With Peritonitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRWTH Aachen UniversityRan2017 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsPeritonitis, Sepsis, Septic ShockArmsPentaglobin®/Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Clinical practice of sepsis-induced immunosuppression: Current immunotherapy and future options.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mortality related to drug-resistant organisms in surgical sepsis-3: an 8-year time trend study using sequential organ failure assessment scores.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulins in Sepsis Therapy-A Clinical View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilaria CavazzutiIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Modena, L.go del Pozzo, 71, 41100, Modena, Italy.
Giulia Serafini
Stefano Busani
Laura Rinaldi
Emanuela Biagioni
Marta Buoncristiano
Massimo Girardis
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether there was an association between adjunctive therapy with IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IgM) and the 30-day mortality rate in patients with septic shock.

methodsIn 2008 we introduced IgM as a possible adjunctive therapy to be provided within 24 h after shock onset in the management protocol for patients with septic shock. In this retrospective study we included the adult patients suitable for IgM therapy admitted to our ICU from January 2008 to December 2011. An unadjusted comparison between patients who did or did not receive IgM therapy, a multivariate logistic model adjusted for confounders and propensity score-based matching were used to evaluate the association between early IgM treatment and mortality.

resultsOne hundred and sixty-eight patients were included in the study. Of these, 92 (54.8%) received IgM therapy. Patients who did or did not receive IgM were similar with regards to infection characteristics, severity scores and sepsis treatment bundle compliance. Patients who received IgM were more likely to have blood cultures before antibiotics and to attain a plateau inspiratory pressure less than 30 cmH2O (p < 0.05). The 30-day mortality rate was reduced by 21.1% (p < 0.05) in the group that received IgM compared to the group that did not. The multivariate adjusted regression model (OR 0.17; CI 95% 0.06-0.49; p = 0.001) and the propensity score-based analysis (OR 0.35; CI 95% 0.14-0.85; p = 0.021) confirmed that IgM therapy was associated with reduced mortality at 30 days after the onset of septic shock.

conclusionsOur experience indicates that early adjunctive treatment with IgM may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with septic shock. However, additional studies are needed to better evaluate the role of IgM therapy in the early phases of septic shock.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospital MortalityHumansImmunoglobulin MImmunotherapyIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRetrospective StudiesSecondary PreventionShock, SepticSurvival RateImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID25217146
OpenAlexW1993929678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.