Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25217092›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after stoma reversal (SR): risk factors, implications, and protective strategies.

Daniel I Chu, Christopher R Schlieve, Dorin T Colibaseanu, Paul J Simpson, Amy E Wagie, Robert R Cima, Elizabeth B Habermann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Predictors of clinically significant complications after stoma reversal: A prospective analytical study.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The impact of prolonged delay to loop ileostomy closure on postoperative morbidity and hospital stay: A retrospective cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Effect of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on incidence rate of surgical site infection after stoma reversal: a pilot study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Considerations in Stoma Reversal.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel I ChuDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, KB427, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA, daniel.chu@aya.yale.edu.
Christopher R Schlieve
Dorin T Colibaseanu
Paul J Simpson
Amy E Wagie
Robert R Cima
Elizabeth B Habermann
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStoma reversals (SRs) are commonly performed with potentially significant postoperative complications including surgical site infections (SSIs). Our aim was to determine the incidence and risk factors for SSIs in a large cohort of SR patients.

designWe reviewed our institutional 2006-2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database for 30-day SSIs in patients undergoing SR. Records were additionally reviewed for 10 non-ACS-NSQIP variables. The primary outcome was SSI after SR. Secondary outcomes were additional 30-day postoperative complications and length-of-stay. Predictors of SSIs were identified using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsFrom 528 SR patients, 36 patients developed a SSI (6.8 %). Most patients underwent SR for loop ileostomies (76.5 %) after index operations for ulcerative colitis (38.6 %) and colorectal cancer (27.8 %). SSI patients had fewer subcutaneous drains compared to patients with no SSI and had significantly higher rates of smoking, ASA 3-4 classification and laparotomies at SR (p < 0.05). Patients with SSI had increased length-of-stay and 30-day morbidities including sepsis and returns to the operating room (p < 0.05) compared to no-SSI patients. On multivariable analysis, subcutaneous drain placement was suggestive of SSI protection (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.2-1.1), but only smoking was significantly associated with an increased risk for SSI (OR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.1-5.4).

conclusionsSmoking increased the risk of SR SSIs in patients by over twofold, and SR SSIs are associated with additional significant morbidities. Smoking cessation should be an important part of any SSI risk-reduction strategy.

Indexed as

IleostomyDrainageFemaleHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioReoperationRisk FactorsSepsisSmokingSurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID25217092
OpenAlexW2017459022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.