Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25217052›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Genetic interactions between Shox2 and Hox genes during the regional growth and development of the mouse limb.

Stanley J Neufeld, Fan Wang, John Cobb

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A putativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Humero-femoral index and diabetes risk in the US population- a case study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2023
    Article
  6. Developmental Genetic Basis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hox genes in the adult skeleton: Novel functions beyond embryonic development.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stanley J NeufeldDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
Fan WangDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
John CobbDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada jacobb@ucalgary.ca.
University of Calgary · CADuke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth and development of the vertebrate limb relies on homeobox genes of the Hox and Shox families, with their independent mutation often giving dose-dependent effects. Here we investigate whether Shox2 and Hox genes function together during mouse limb development by modulating their relative dosage and examining the limb for nonadditive effects on growth. Using double mRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in single embryos, we first show that Shox2 and Hox genes have associated spatial expression dynamics, with Shox2 expression restricted to the proximal limb along with Hoxd9 and Hoxa11 expression, juxtaposing the distal expression of Hoxa13 and Hoxd13. By generating mice with all possible dosage combinations of mutant Shox2 alleles and HoxA/D cluster deletions, we then show that their coordinated proximal limb expression is critical to generate normally proportioned limb segments. These epistatic interactions tune limb length, where Shox2 underexpression enhances, and Shox2 overexpression suppresses, Hox-mutant phenotypes. Disruption of either Shox2 or Hox genes leads to a similar reduction in Runx2 expression in the developing humerus, suggesting their concerted action drives cartilage maturation during normal development. While we furthermore provide evidence that Hox gene function influences Shox2 expression, this regulation is limited in extent and is unlikely on its own to be a major explanation for their genetic interaction. Given the similar effect of human SHOX mutations on regional limb growth, Shox and Hox genes may generally function as genetic interaction partners during the growth and development of the proximal vertebrate limb.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenes, HomeoboxAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsExtremitiesGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMiceMutationNeoplasm ProteinsTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsHoxa11 protein, mouseHoxd13 protein, mouseHoxd9 protein, mouseNeoplasm ProteinsShox2 protein, mouseTranscription Factorschondrogenesisepistasisfluorescence in situ hybridizationperichondriumSHOX

Identifiers

PMID25217052
PMCPMC4224156
OpenAlexW2078325636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.