Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25216680›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2014

Substrate binding and specificity of rhomboid intramembrane protease revealed by substrate-peptide complex structures.

Sebastian Zoll, Stancho Stanchev, Jakub Began, Jan Skerle, Martin Lepšík, Lucie Peclinovská, Pavel Majer, Kvido Strisovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Regulation of mixotrophy inMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Inhibitory proteins ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Dsc complex and its role in Golgi quality control.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. AnbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian ZollInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Stancho StanchevInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jakub BeganInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan SkerleInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin LepšíkInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie PeclinovskáInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel MajerInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kvido StrisovskyInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic kvido.strisovsky@uochb.cas.cz.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms of intramembrane proteases are incompletely understood due to the lack of structural data on substrate complexes. To gain insight into substrate binding by rhomboid proteases, we have synthesised a series of novel peptidyl-chloromethylketone (CMK) inhibitors and analysed their interactions with Escherichia coli rhomboid GlpG enzymologically and structurally. We show that peptidyl-CMKs derived from the natural rhomboid substrate TatA from bacterium Providencia stuartii bind GlpG in a substrate-like manner, and their co-crystal structures with GlpG reveal the S1 to S4 subsites of the protease. The S1 subsite is prominent and merges into the 'water retention site', suggesting intimate interplay between substrate binding, specificity and catalysis. Unexpectedly, the S4 subsite is plastically formed by residues of the L1 loop, an important but hitherto enigmatic feature of the rhomboid fold. We propose that the homologous region of members of the wider rhomboid-like protein superfamily may have similar substrate or client-protein binding function. Finally, using molecular dynamics, we generate a model of the Michaelis complex of the substrate bound in the active site of GlpG.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationAmino Acid Chloromethyl KetonesBinding SitesCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayDNA-Binding ProteinsEndopeptidasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMutationProtein BindingProvidenciaRecombinant ProteinsSubstrate SpecificityAmino Acid Chloromethyl KetonesDNA-Binding ProteinsEndopeptidasesEscherichia coli ProteinsGlpG protein, E coliMembrane ProteinsRecombinant Proteinsintramembrane proteaserhomboid familyrhomboid proteasestructuresubstrate recognition

Identifiers

PMID25216680
PMCPMC4253528
OpenAlexW2064680318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.