Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25216666›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2015

Explaining the excess mortality in Scotland compared with England: pooling of 18 cohort studies.

Gerry McCartney, Tom C Russ, David Walsh, Jim Lewsey, Michael Smith, George Davey Smith, Emmanuel Stamatakis, G David Batty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Long-term costs associated with healthcare use of people with cancer in Scotland.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gerry McCartneyNHS Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Tom C RussAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Scottish Dementia Clinical Research Network, NHS Scotland, Murray Royal Hospital, Perth, UK Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David WalshGlasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK.
Jim LewseyInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Michael SmithNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
George Davey SmithMRC Centre for Causal Analyses in Translational Epidemiology, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Emmanuel StamatakisDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
G David BattyCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0700704Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/1Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMortality in Scotland is higher than in the rest of west and central Europe and is improving more slowly. Relative to England and Wales, the excess is only partially explained by area deprivation. We tested the extent to which sociodemographic, behavioural, anthropometric and biological factors explain the higher mortality in Scotland compared with England.

methodsPooled data from 18 nationally representative cohort studies comprising the Health Surveys for England (HSE) and the Scottish Health Survey (SHS). Cox regression analysis was used to quantify the excess mortality risk in Scotland relative to England with adjustment for baseline characteristics.

resultsA total of 193,873 participants with a mean of 9.6 years follow-up gave rise to 21,345 deaths. The age-adjusted and sex-adjusted all-cause mortality HR for Scottish respondents compared with English respondents was 1.40 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.47), which attenuated to 1.29 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.36) with the addition of the baseline socioeconomic and behavioural characteristics. Cause-specific mortality HRs attenuated only marginally to 1.43 (95% 1.28 to 1.60) for ischaemic heart disease, 1.37 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.63) for stroke, 1.41 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.53) for all cancers, 3.43 (95% CI 1.85 to 6.36) for illicit drug-related poisoning and 4.64 (95% CI 3.55 to 6.05) for alcohol-related mortality. The excess was greatest among young adults (16-44 years) and was observed across all occupational social classes with the greatest excess in the unskilled group.

conclusionsOnly a quarter of the excess mortality among Scottish respondents could be explained by the available baseline risk factors. Greater understanding is required on the lived experience of poverty, the role of social support, and the historical, environmental, cultural and political influences on health in Scotland.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedCohort studiesMORTALITYPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL CLASSSOCIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID25216666
PMCPMC4283682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.