Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25216415›Full record

ArticleInternational surgery

Thyroid surgery in the elderly: a comparative experience of 400 patients from an Italian university hospital.

Silvestro Canonico, Gianluca Pellino, Domenico Pameggiani, Guido Sciaudone, Giuseppe Candilio, G Serena De Fatico, Isabella Landino, Rosa Marcellinaro, Federica Rocco, Lucio Selvaggi and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvestro CanonicoDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Second University of Naples, Italy.
Gianluca Pellino
Domenico Pameggiani
Guido Sciaudone
Giuseppe Candilio
G Serena De Fatico
Isabella Landino
Rosa Marcellinaro
Federica Rocco
Lucio Selvaggi
Umberto Parmeggiani
Francesco Selvaggi
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare disease features and surgical complications of patients undergoing surgery under or over 65 years of age. We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing thyroidectomy or lobectomy from January 1990 through January 2012 in our Institution. Patients aged over 65 years of age were compared with younger patients on a 1:1 ratio. A total of 2012 patients were operated on during the study period. Two-hundred patients aged > 65 years were compared with 200 patients < 65 years old. In this series, no significant differences were observed concerning surgical complications between groups. At multivariate analysis, masses causing compression, extended approaches and malignant lesions were significant predictors of complications, irrespective of age. Due to longer life expectancy, elderly patients are being operated on more frequently. Safety of thyroid surgery in this population is still debated. We observed no difference in surgical outcomes between elderly and younger patients; however, some features of the diseases impair survival in the former. Age did not increase likeliness of worse outcomes in patients receiving thyroid surgery.

Indexed as

ThyroidectomyAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationElderlyLobectomyThyroidectomyThyroid surgery

Identifiers

PMID25216415
PMCPMC4253918
OpenAlexW2008932336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.