Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25216354›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Comparative genome sequencing reveals genomic signature of extreme desiccation tolerance in the anhydrobiotic midge.

Oleg Gusev, Yoshitaka Suetsugu, Richard Cornette, Takeshi Kawashima, Maria D Logacheva, Alexey S Kondrashov, Aleksey A Penin, Rie Hatanaka, Shingo Kikuta, Sachiko Shimura and 18 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biomolecular condensates-Prerequisites for anhydrobiosis?Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A sodium-dependent trehalose transporter contributes to anhydrobiosis in insect cell line, Pv11.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Oleg Gusev1] National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan [2] Institute of Fundamental Biology and Medicine, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia [3] ISS Science Project Office, Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Tsukuba 305-8505, Japan.
Yoshitaka SuetsuguNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Richard CornetteNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Takeshi KawashimaOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.
Maria D Logacheva1] Department of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia [2] A. N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia [3] Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 127994, Russia.
Alexey S Kondrashov1] Department of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia [2] Life Sciences Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Aleksey A Penin1] Department of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia [2] Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 127994, Russia [3] Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Rie HatanakaNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Shingo KikutaNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Sachiko ShimuraNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Hiroyuki KanamoriNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Yuichi KatayoseNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Takashi MatsumotoNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Elena ShagimardanovaInstitute of Fundamental Biology and Medicine, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Dmitry AlexeevScientific Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Medicine, Federal Bio-Medical Agency of Russia, Moscow 119828, Russia.
Vadim GovorunScientific Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Medicine, Federal Bio-Medical Agency of Russia, Moscow 119828, Russia.
Jennifer WisecaverDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Alexander MikheyevOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.
Ryo KoyanagiOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.
Manabu FujieOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.
Tomoaki NishiyamaAdvanced Science Research Center, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-0934, Japan.
Shuji Shigenobu1] National Institute for Basic Biology (NIBB), Okazaki 444-8585, Japan [2] Department of Basic Biology, School of Life Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Tomoko F ShibataNational Institute for Basic Biology (NIBB), Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Veronika GolyginaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Mitsuyasu Hasebe1] National Institute for Basic Biology (NIBB), Okazaki 444-8585, Japan [2] Department of Basic Biology, School of Life Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Takashi OkudaNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.
Nori SatohOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.
Takahiro KikawadaNational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anhydrobiosis represents an extreme example of tolerance adaptation to water loss, where an organism can survive in an ametabolic state until water returns. Here we report the first comparative analysis examining the genomic background of extreme desiccation tolerance, which is exclusively found in larvae of the only anhydrobiotic insect, Polypedilum vanderplanki. We compare the genomes of P. vanderplanki and a congeneric desiccation-sensitive midge P. nubifer. We determine that the genome of the anhydrobiotic species specifically contains clusters of multi-copy genes with products that act as molecular shields. In addition, the genome possesses several groups of genes with high similarity to known protective proteins. However, these genes are located in distinct paralogous clusters in the genome apart from the classical orthologues of the corresponding genes shared by both chironomids and other insects. The transcripts of these clustered paralogues contribute to a large majority of the mRNA pool in the desiccating larvae and most likely define successful anhydrobiosis. Comparison of expression patterns of orthologues between two chironomid species provides evidence for the existence of desiccation-specific gene expression systems in P. vanderplanki.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectPhylogenyAnimalsBiological EvolutionChironomidaeChromosomes, InsectDesiccationGene ExpressionGenome SizeInsect ProteinsLarvaMethyltransferasesSequence Analysis, DNAStress, PhysiologicalThioredoxinsWaterInsect ProteinsMethyltransferasesThioredoxinsWater

Identifiers

PMID25216354
PMCPMC4175575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.