Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25215943›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Whole body center of mass estimation with portable sensors: using the statically equivalent serial chain and a Kinect.

Alejandro González, Mitsuhiro Hayashibe, Vincent Bonnet, Philippe Fraisse

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anxiety sensitivity and bodily kinematics.Behaviour research and therapy · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MoRe-T2 (mobility research trajectory tracker): validation and application.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alejandro GonzálezINRIA (Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique), DEMAR Team, Montpellier 34095, France. gonzalezde@lirmm.fr.
Mitsuhiro HayashibeINRIA (Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique), DEMAR Team, Montpellier 34095, France. hayashibe@lirmm.fr.
Vincent BonnetMovement to Health (M2H) Laboratory, EuroMov, University of Montpellier 1, Montpellier 34090, France. bonnet.vincent@gmail.com.
Philippe FraisseINRIA (Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique), DEMAR Team, Montpellier 34095, France. fraisse@lirmm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trajectory of the whole body center of mass (CoM) is useful as a reliable metric of postural stability. If the evaluation of a subject-specific CoM were available outside of the laboratory environment, it would improve the assessment of the effects of physical rehabilitation. This paper develops a method that enables tracking CoM position using low-cost sensors that can be moved around by a therapist or easily installed inside a patient's home. Here, we compare the accuracy of a personalized CoM estimation using the statically equivalent serial chain (SESC) method and measurements obtained with the Kinect to the case of a SESC obtained with high-end equipment (Vicon). We also compare these estimates to literature-based ones for both sensors. The method was validated with seven able-bodied volunteers for whom the SESC was identified using 40 static postures. The literature-based estimation with Vicon measurements had a average error 24.9 ± 3.7 mm; this error was reduced to 12.8 ± 9.1 mm with the SESC identification. When using Kinect measurements, the literature-based estimate had an error of 118.4 ± 50.0 mm, while the SESC error was 26.6 ± 6.0 mm. The subject-specific SESC estimate using low-cost sensors has an equivalent performance as the literature-based one with high-end sensors. The SESC method can improve CoM estimation of elderly and neurologically impaired subjects by considering variations in their mass distribution.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexComputers, HandheldModels, BiologicalTransducersBody WaterComputer SimulationEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25215943
PMCPMC4208208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.