ArticleSurgical infections2014
Proceedings of the first international summit on intestinal anastomotic leak, Chicago, Illinois, October 4-5, 2012.
Article in Surgical infections, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevention of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery with local antibiotic decontamination: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single center trial.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Trial
- The impact of sarcopenia on the postoperative outcome in colorectal cancer surgery.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2023Review
- Factors Contributing to Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Surgery: Why, When, and Who Leaks?Cureus · 2022Review
- Article
- New understanding of gut microbiota and colorectal anastomosis leak: A collaborative review of the current concepts.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Serial estimation of serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for early detection of anastomotic leak after elective intestinal surgeries: a prospective cohort study.Turkish journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract to Prevent Postoperative Pneumonia and Anastomotic Leakage after Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Involvement of the Commensal OrganismSurgical infections · 2020Article
- Bowel preparation under siege.The British journal of surgery · 2020Review
- Microbiome Medicine: This Changes Everything.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2018Article
- Local antibiotic decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage short-term outcome in rectal cancer surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Article
- The gut microbiota and gastrointestinal surgery.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Review
- Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Colorectal anastomotic healing: why the biological processes that lead to anastomotic leakage should be revealed prior to conducting intervention studies.BMC gastroenterology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe first international summit on anastomotic leak was held in Chicago in October, 2012 to assess current knowledge in the field and develop novel lines of inquiry. The following report is a summary of the proceedings with commentaries and future prospects for clinical trials and laboratory investigations.
backgroundAnastomotic leakage remains a devastating problem for the patient, and a continuing challenge to the surgeon operating on high-risk areas of the gastrointestinal tract such as the esophagus and rectum. Despite the traditional wisdom that anastomotic leak is because of technique, evidence to support this is weak-to-non-existent. Outcome data continue to demonstrate that expert high-volume surgeons working in high-volume centers continue to experience anastomotic leaks and that surgeons cannot predict reliably which patients will leak.
methodsA one and one-half day summit was held and a small working group assembled to review current practices, opinions, scientific evidence, and potential paths forward to understand and decrease the incidence of anastomotic leak.
resultsRESULTS of a survey of the opinions of the group demonstrated that the majority of participants believe that anastomotic leak is a complicated biologic problem whose pathogenesis remains ill-defined. The group opined that anastomotic leak is underreported clinically, it is not because of technique except when there is gross inattention to it, and that results from animal models are mostly irrelevant to the human condition.
conclusionsA fresh and unbiased examination of the causes and strategies for prevention of anastomotic leak needs to be addressed by a continuous working group of surgeons, basic scientists, and clinical trialists to realize a real and significant reduction in its incidence and morbidity. Such a path forward is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.