ReviewWorld journal of emergency medicine2010
What are the ten new commandments in severe polytrauma management?
Review in World journal of emergency medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A short decision time for transcatheter embolization can better associate mortality in patients with pelvic fracture: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Fluid resuscitation in trauma: what are the best strategies and fluids?International journal of emergency medicine · 2019Review
- Cardiac Troponin I is Increased in Patients with Polytrauma and Chest or Head Trauma. Results of A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2016Article
- Medical rescue of naval combat: challenges and future.Military Medical Research · 2015Article
- Recent advances of hemorrhage management in severe trauma.Emergency medicine international · 2014Review
- Current pre-hospital traumatic brain injury management in China.World journal of emergency medicine · 2014Article
- Evolving frontiers in severe polytrauma management - refining the essential principles.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2013Article
- Ideal resuscitation fluid in hypovolemia: The quest is on and miles to go!International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to provide a concise overview of the trauma management evolution in the past decade. 1) Trauma care priorities have incorporated staff protection against infection and early decision making in addition to the conventional ABCDE. 2) Five stratified levels for DAM have replaced the non-specific conventional Plans A & B. 3) CT scanning can be the tunnel to death for the hemodynamically unstable patient. 4) DPL has virtually been replaced by the FAST USG. 5) Direct whole-body MDCT provides rapid imaging diagnosis & expedites the definitive treatment but carries high radiation hazards. 6) The dynamic shock assessment by fluid resuscitation response provides more outcome-specific evaluation than the static blood volume loss model. 7) DCR comprising of permissive hypotension, hemostatic resuscitation & DCS aims to overcome the lethal triad of trauma. Early transfusion of blood components of FFP & platelet concentrates improves the outcome in massive blood transfusion. 8) DCS aims to rectify the deranged physiology and not to fully restore the damaged anatomy. 9) A pre-defined protocol for major pelvic fracture can be life-saving and the novel Pre-PPP (pre-peritoneal pelvic packing) may further reduce mortality coupled with the necessary TCAE. 10) Injury prevention is equally important if not more than the trauma resuscitation & operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25214947PMC4129756W97814375What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.