ArticleInternational journal of rheumatology2014
Validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the persian version of the oxford elbow score.
Article in International journal of rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating minimal clinically important differences in primary elective total elbow arthroplasty using distribution-based methods.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- The Oxford Elbow Score demonstrated good measurement properties when used with a shortened 7-day recall period.JSES international · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Disability Following Hand and Upper Extremity Conditions in Persian Population.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2021Review
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- The Best Option in Treatment of Modified Mason Type III Radial Head Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Radial Head Excision.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2018Article
- Validation of the Persian Version of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) Questionnaire.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2018Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Patient Rated Wris t Evaluation.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2017Article
- [Validation of the German version of the Oxford Elbow Score : A cross-sectional study].Der Orthopade · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is a patient-reported questionnaire used to assess outcomes after elbow surgery. The aim of this study was to validate and adapt the OES into Persian language. After forward-backward translation of the OES into Persian, a total number of 92 patients after elbow surgeries completed the Persian OES along with the Persian DASH and SF-36. To assess test-retest reliability, 31 randomly selected patients (34%) completed the Persian OES again after three days while abstaining from all forms of therapeutic regimens. Reliability of the Persian OES was assessed by measuring intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to test the construct validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92 showing excellent reliability. Cronbach's alpha for function, pain, and social-psychological subscales was 0.95, 0.86, and 0.85, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.85 for the overall questionnaire and 0.90, 0.76, and 0.75 for function, pain, and social-psychological subscales, respectively. Construct validity was confirmed as the Spearman correlation between OES and DASH was 0.80. Persian OES is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure to assess postsurgical elbow status in Persian speaking population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.