ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2014
Regenerative nanomedicine: current perspectives and future directions.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Membranes for Bone Engineering Enriched with Magnesium- and Strontium-Substituted Hydroxyapatite.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Applications of Nanobiotechnology in Medicine.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Eco-Friendly Preparation of Se, Zn, and Ag MONPs and Their Current Medical Applications and Drug Delivery for AD Diseases.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles and Nanoparticles in Regenerative and Personalised Medicine: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Roles-A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- POSS-based hybrid biomaterials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Musculoskeletal Organs-on-Chips: An Emerging Platform for Studying the Nanotechnology-Biology Interface.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Exploring the innovative application of cerium oxide nanoparticles for addressing oxidative stress in ovarian tissue regeneration.Journal of ovarian research · 2024Review
- Precision Nanomedicine with Bio-Inspired Nanosystems: Recent Trends and Challenges in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Membrane-Coated Bioengineered Nanocarriers in Targeted Nanotherapeutics.Journal of xenobiotics · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Applications of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Loaded with Gold Nanoparticles for Regenerative Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: Review of Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Effects.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Article
- Insights into the Role of Biopolymer Aerogel Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Polymers · 2021Article
- Rotary-jet spun polycaprolactone/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds modified by simulated body fluid influenced the flexural mode of the neoformed bone.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020Article
- Corneal Stem Cells as a Source of Regenerative Cell-Based Therapy.Stem cells international · 2020Review
- Biologically produced silver chloride nanoparticles from B. megaterium modulate interleukin secretion by human adipose stem cell spheroids.Cytotechnology · 2018Article
- Multiscale technologies for treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy.Nature nanotechnology · 2017Review
- Regenerative Medicine: Charting a New Course in Wound Healing.Advances in wound care · 2016Review
- Nanostructured TiO₂ Surfaces Promote Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Differentiation to Osteoblasts.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Response of human mesenchymal stem cells to intrafibrillar nanohydroxyapatite content and extrafibrillar nanohydroxyapatite in biomimetic chitosan/silk fibroin/nanohydroxyapatite nanofibrous membrane scaffolds.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015Article
- Cytocompatibility of a self-adhesive gutta-percha root-filling material.Journal of conservative dentistry : JCDArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has considerably accelerated the growth of regenerative medicine in recent years. Application of nanotechnology in regenerative medicine has revolutionized the designing of grafts and scaffolds which has resulted in new grafts/scaffold systems having significantly enhanced cellular and tissue regenerative properties. Since the cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction in biological systems takes place at the nanoscale level, the application of nanotechnology gives an edge in modifying the cellular function and/or matrix function in a more desired way to mimic the native tissue/organ. In this review, we focus on the nanotechnology-based recent advances and trends in regenerative medicine and discussed under individual organ systems including bone, cartilage, nerve, skin, teeth, myocardium, liver and eye. Recent studies that are related to the design of various types of nanostructured scaffolds and incorporation of nanomaterials into the matrices are reported. We have also documented reports where these materials and matrices have been compared for their better biocompatibility and efficacy in supporting the damaged tissue. In addition to the recent developments, future directions and possible challenges in translating the findings from bench to bedside are outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.