Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25213708›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2015

Using drug response data to identify molecular effectors, and molecular "omic" data to identify candidate drugs in cancer.

William C Reinhold, Sudhir Varma, Vinodh N Rajapakse, Augustin Luna, Fabricio Garmus Sousa, Kurt W Kohn, Yves G Pommier

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William C ReinholdDevelopmental Therapeutic Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 37, room 5041, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA, wcr@mail.nih.gov.
Sudhir Varma
Vinodh N Rajapakse
Augustin Luna
Fabricio Garmus Sousa
Kurt W Kohn
Yves G Pommier

Funding

MSKCC Center for Translational Cancer Genomic AnalysisU24CA143840 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LADANYI, MARC, SANDER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2016
$11.5M
Genomics and Systems Pharmacology CoreZICBC011475 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI REINHOLD, WILLIAM · 2013 to 2025
$3.4M
PROTEIN-ASSOCIATED DNA BREAKS AS INDICATOR OF TOPOISOMERASE INHIBITIONZ01BC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC006150Intramural NIH HHS ZIC BC011475NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current convergence of molecular and pharmacological data provides unprecedented opportunities to gain insights into the relationships between the two types of data. Multiple forms of large-scale molecular data, including but not limited to gene and microRNA transcript expression, DNA somatic and germline variations from next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing, and DNA copy number from array comparative genomic hybridization are all potentially informative when one attempts to recognize the panoply of potentially influential events both for cancer progression and therapeutic outcome. Concurrently, there has also been a substantial expansion of the pharmacological data being accrued in a systematic fashion. For cancer cell lines, the National Cancer Institute cell line panel (NCI-60), the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), and the collaborative Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) databases all provide subsets of these forms of data. For the patient-derived data, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) provides analogous forms of genomic information along with treatment histories. Integration of these data in turn relies on the fields of statistics and statistical learning. Multiple algorithmic approaches may be chosen, depending on the data being considered, and the nature of the question being asked. Combining these algorithms with prior biological knowledge, the results of molecular biological studies, and the consideration of genes as pathways or functional groups provides both the challenge and the potential of the field. The ultimate goal is to provide a paradigm shift in the way that drugs are selected to provide a more targeted and efficacious outcome for the patient.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingPharmacogeneticsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorHumansNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25213708
PMCPMC4282979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.