ReviewHuman genetics2015
Using drug response data to identify molecular effectors, and molecular "omic" data to identify candidate drugs in cancer.
Review in Human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of phenocopies improves prediction of targeted therapy response over DNA mutations alone.NPJ genomic medicine · 2022Article
- Predicting cancer drug TARGETS - TreAtment Response Generalized Elastic-neT Signatures.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Predicting tumor response to drugs based on gene-expression biomarkers of sensitivity learned from cancer cell lines.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Sequential analysis of transcript expression patterns improves survival prediction in multiple cancers.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- The pro-tumorigenic host response to cancer therapies.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2019Review
- Drivers of topoisomerase II poisoning mimic and complement cytotoxicity in AML cells.Oncotarget · 2019Article
- A pan-cancer study of the transcriptional regulation of uricogenesis in human tumours: pathological and pharmacological correlates.Bioscience reports · 2018Article
- Estimating Potency in High-Throughput Screening Experiments by Maximizing the Rate of Change in Weighted Shannon Entropy.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- rcellminer: exploring molecular profiles and drug response of the NCI-60 cell lines in R.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Current dichotomy between traditional molecular biological and omic research in cancer biology and pharmacology.World journal of clinical oncology · 2015Article
- Functional genomics to uncover drug mechanism of action.Nature chemical biology · 2015Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current convergence of molecular and pharmacological data provides unprecedented opportunities to gain insights into the relationships between the two types of data. Multiple forms of large-scale molecular data, including but not limited to gene and microRNA transcript expression, DNA somatic and germline variations from next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing, and DNA copy number from array comparative genomic hybridization are all potentially informative when one attempts to recognize the panoply of potentially influential events both for cancer progression and therapeutic outcome. Concurrently, there has also been a substantial expansion of the pharmacological data being accrued in a systematic fashion. For cancer cell lines, the National Cancer Institute cell line panel (NCI-60), the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), and the collaborative Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) databases all provide subsets of these forms of data. For the patient-derived data, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) provides analogous forms of genomic information along with treatment histories. Integration of these data in turn relies on the fields of statistics and statistical learning. Multiple algorithmic approaches may be chosen, depending on the data being considered, and the nature of the question being asked. Combining these algorithms with prior biological knowledge, the results of molecular biological studies, and the consideration of genes as pathways or functional groups provides both the challenge and the potential of the field. The ultimate goal is to provide a paradigm shift in the way that drugs are selected to provide a more targeted and efficacious outcome for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.