Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25213693›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2014

Genome sequence of Candidatus Riesia pediculischaeffi, endosymbiont of chimpanzee lice, and genomic comparison of recently acquired endosymbionts from human and chimpanzee lice.

Bret M Boyd, Julie M Allen, Valérie de Crécy-Lagard, David L Reed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome analysis of "Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endosymbiotic bacteria of the boar louseFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bret M BoydFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 Genetics and Genomics Graduate Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610 bboyd@ufl.edu.
Julie M AllenIllinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820.
Valérie de Crécy-LagardDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611.
David L ReedFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Synthesis and function of Queuosine in BacteriaR01GM070641 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DE CRECY-LAGARD, VALERIE A · 2006 to 2023
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070641NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM70641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The obligate-heritable endosymbionts of insects possess some of the smallest known bacterial genomes. This is likely due to loss of genomic material during symbiosis. The mode and rate of this erosion may change over evolutionary time: faster in newly formed associations and slower in long-established ones. The endosymbionts of human and anthropoid primate lice present a unique opportunity to study genome erosion in newly established (or young) symbionts. This is because we have a detailed phylogenetic history of these endosymbionts with divergence dates for closely related species. This allows for genome evolution to be studied in detail and rates of change to be estimated in a phylogenetic framework. Here, we sequenced the genome of the chimpanzee louse endosymbiont (Candidatus Riesia pediculischaeffi) and compared it with the closely related genome of the human body louse endosymbiont. From this comparison, we found evidence for recent genome erosion leading to gene loss in these endosymbionts. Although gene loss was detected, it was not significantly greater than in older endosymbionts from aphids and ants. Additionally, we searched for genes associated with B-vitamin synthesis in the two louse endosymbiont genomes because these endosymbionts are believed to synthesize essential B vitamins absent in the louse's diet. All of the expected genes were present, except those involved in thiamin synthesis. We failed to find genes encoding for proteins involved in the biosynthesis of thiamin or any complete exogenous means of salvaging thiamin, suggesting there is an undescribed mechanism for the salvage of thiamin. Finally, genes encoding for the pantothenate de novo biosynthesis pathway were located on a plasmid in both taxa along with a heat shock protein. Movement of these genes onto a plasmid may be functionally and evolutionarily significant, potentially increasing production and guarding against the deleterious effects of mutation. These data add to a growing resource of obligate endosymbiont genomes and to our understanding of the rate and mode of genome erosion in obligate animal-associated bacteria. Ultimately sequencing additional louse p-endosymbiont genomes will provide a model system for studying genome evolution in obligate host associated bacteria.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialAnimalsEnterobacteriaceaeGene DeletionHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansPantothenic AcidPan troglodytesPhthirapteraSymbiosisThiamineHeat-Shock ProteinsPantothenic AcidThiaminegamma-proteobacteriagene lossgenome erosionPediculusprimary-endosymbiont

Identifiers

PMID25213693
PMCPMC4232544
OpenAlexW2096441208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.