ArticleLeukemia & lymphoma2015
A phase 1 study of vorinostat maintenance after autologous transplant in high-risk lymphoma.
Article in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00561418 (Histone Deacetylase), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibition Using Vorinostat (SAHA) After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Lymphoma
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repurposing Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors for Management of Solid Organ Transplant Rejection.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2025Review
- Advances in targeting histone deacetylase for treatment of solid tumors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Genetic alterations and their clinical implications in DLBCL.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019Review
- Strategies to improve outcomes of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant in lymphoma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Only a minority of patients with high risk lymphoma will be cured with autologous transplant, so maintenance with vorinostat, an oral agent with activity in relapsed lymphoma, was studied starting day + 60 for 21 consecutive days followed by a week off for up to 11 cycles. Twenty-three patients with lymphoma were treated. Ten patients completed the full 11-cycle treatment plan per protocol, four patients were removed due to progressive disease and seven withdrew or were removed from the study due to toxicities. Despite Prevnar vaccine administration every 2 months for three injections, the mean antibody concentration never reached protective levels (> 0.35 μg/mL). Fatigue and functional well-being measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General improved significantly from cycle 1 to cycle 7, but depression scores from the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale did not change. Given the toxicities observed, this broad-spectrum deacetylase inhibitor at this schedule is not optimal for prolonged maintenance therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.