ArticleGenetics2014
Population genetics inference for longitudinally-sampled mutants under strong selection.
Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct estimation of genotype fitness from time series.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Assessing Ancient DNA Sampling Strategies for Natural Selection Inference in Humans Using Allele Frequency Time Series Data.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Linkage-aware inference of fitness from short-read time-series genomic data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Linkage-aware inference of fitness from short-read time-series genomic data.Virus evolution · 2026Article
- Selection Estimation from Genetic Time-Series Data: Effects of Limited Sampling and Genetic Drift.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- A binary trait model reveals the fitness effects of HIV-1 escape from T cell responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- A binary trait model reveals the fitness effects of HIV-1 escape from T cell responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Self-contained Beta-with-Spikes approximation for inference under a Wright-Fisher model.Genetics · 2023Article
- Estimating Temporally Variable Selection Intensity from Ancient DNA Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Bézier interpolation improves the inference of dynamical models from data.Physical review. E · 2023Article
- Bait-ER: A Bayesian method to detect targets of selection in Evolve-and-Resequence experiments.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Article
- Inferring selection effects in SARS-CoV-2 with Bayesian Viral Allele Selection.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Inferring Epistasis from Genetic Time-series Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- MPL resolves genetic linkage in fitness inference from complex evolutionary histories.Nature biotechnology · 2021Article
- Article
- Inference of Selection from Genetic Time Series Using Various Parametric Approximations to the Wright-Fisher Model.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2015
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Longitudinal allele frequency data are becoming increasingly prevalent. Such samples permit statistical inference of the population genetics parameters that influence the fate of mutant variants. To infer these parameters by maximum likelihood, the mutant frequency is often assumed to evolve according to the Wright-Fisher model. For computational reasons, this discrete model is commonly approximated by a diffusion process that requires the assumption that the forces of natural selection and mutation are weak. This assumption is not always appropriate. For example, mutations that impart drug resistance in pathogens may evolve under strong selective pressure. Here, we present an alternative approximation to the mutant-frequency distribution that does not make any assumptions about the magnitude of selection or mutation and is much more computationally efficient than the standard diffusion approximation. Simulation studies are used to compare the performance of our method to that of the Wright-Fisher and Gaussian diffusion approximations. For large populations, our method is found to provide a much better approximation to the mutant-frequency distribution when selection is strong, while all three methods perform comparably when selection is weak. Importantly, maximum-likelihood estimates of the selection coefficient are severely attenuated when selection is strong under the two diffusion models, but not when our method is used. This is further demonstrated with an application to mutant-frequency data from an experimental study of bacteriophage evolution. We therefore recommend our method for estimating the selection coefficient when the effective population size is too large to utilize the discrete Wright-Fisher model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.