Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25213162›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2014

A phase I trial of pantoprazole in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors: evaluation of pharmacokinetics of both drugs and tissue penetration of doxorubicin.

Irene Brana, Alberto Ocana, Eric X Chen, Albiruni R A Razak, Christine Haines, Carol Lee, Sarah Douglas, Lisa Wang, Lillian L Siu, Ian F Tannock and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Oral Carbon Monoxide Enhances Autophagy Modulation in Prostate, Pancreatic, and Lung Cancers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Autophagy in tumour immunity and therapy.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Crosstalks between inflammasome and autophagy in cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Irene BranaDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, M5G 2 M9, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alberto Ocana
Eric X Chen
Albiruni R A Razak
Christine Haines
Carol Lee
Sarah Douglas
Lisa Wang
Lillian L Siu
Ian F Tannock
Philippe L Bedard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn preclinical models, the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole enhances the antitumor activity of chemotherapeutic agents by improving drug distribution and by inhibiting autophagy.

methodsPatients with advanced solid tumors (n = 24) received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and escalating doses of pantoprazole (80, 160, 240 and 360 mg) administered intravenously prior to doxorubicin. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic studies. An optional biopsy was performed to evaluate doxorubicin concentration and pharmacodynamic markers of drug activity.

resultsTwenty-four patients participated in the study (17 in the dose escalation phase and 7 in the dose expansion). Three patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity (grade 3 fatigue in the three cases), one patient at dose level 3 (pantoprazole 240 mg) and two patients at dose level 4 (pantoprazole 360 mg). Dose level 4 was considered to exceed the maximum tolerated dose. The recommended phase II dose was pantoprazole 240 mg and doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2). The most commonly observed toxicities included fatigue, neutropenia and leukopenia. Two patients achieved a confirmed partial response. Median maximum serum concentration of pantoprazole was 84.3 μM at 1-2 h after injection of pantoprazole 240 mg. No drug-drug interaction was observed. A single on-treatment tumor biopsy showed a sharply decreasing gradient in doxorubicin concentration and associated activity markers with increasing distance from tumor blood vessels.

conclusionAdministration of high doses of pantoprazole in combination with doxorubicin is feasible. The recommended phase II dose of pantoprazole, 240 mg, will be evaluated in combination with docetaxel as first line in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Indexed as

2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDoxorubicinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPantoprazoleResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesDoxorubicinPantoprazole

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.