Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25213117›Full record

ArticlePlanta2015

Impact of concurrent overexpression of cytosolic glutamine synthetase (GS1) and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) on growth and development in transgenic tobacco.

Mark Seger, Sayed Gebril, Jules Tabilona, Amanda Peel, Champa Sengupta-Gopalan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MdbZIP44-MdCPRF2-like-Horticulture research · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. New Insights intoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Co-overexpression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Co-crystal Structure ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark SegerDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA.
Sayed Gebril
Jules Tabilona
Amanda Peel
Champa Sengupta-Gopalan
New Mexico State University · US

Funding

RISE PROGRAM AT NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYR25GM061222 · NIGMS · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI HOUSTON, JESSICA PEREA, REDDI, LAKSHMI · 2000 to 2022
$21.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25GM061222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe outcome of simultaneously increasing SPS and GS activities in transgenic tobacco, suggests that sucrose is the major determinant of growth and development, and is not affected by changes in N assimilation. Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) are the major components required for plant growth and the metabolic pathways for C and N assimilation are very closely interlinked. Maintaining an appropriate balance or ratio of sugar to nitrogen metabolites in the cell, is important for the regulation of plant growth and development. To understand how C and N metabolism interact, we manipulated the expression of key genes in C and N metabolism individually and concurrently and checked for the repercussions. Transgenic tobacco plants with a cytosolic soybean glutamine synthetase (GS1) gene and a sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) gene from maize, both driven by the CaMV 35S promoter were produced. Co-transformants, with both the transgenes were produced by sexual crosses. While GS is the key enzyme in N assimilation, involved in the synthesis of glutamine, SPS plays a key role in C metabolism by catalyzing the synthesis of sucrose. Moreover, to check if nitrate has any role in this interaction, the plants were grown under both low and high nitrogen. The SPS enzyme activity in the SPS and SPS/GS1 co-transformants were the same under both nitrogen regimens. However, the GS activity was lower in the co-transformants compared to the GS1 transformants, specifically under low nitrogen conditions. The GS1/SPS transformants showed a phenotype similar to the SPS transformants, suggesting that sucrose is the major determinant of growth and development in tobacco, and its effect is only marginally affected by increased N assimilation. Sucrose may be functioning in a metabolic capacity or as a signaling molecule.

Indexed as

CarbonCytosolElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFlowersGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, PlantGlucosyltransferasesGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseGlycine maxNicotianaNitrogenPhenotypePlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedStarchSucroseCarbonGlucosyltransferasesGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseNitrogenPlant ProteinsStarchSucrosesucrose-phosphate synthase

Identifiers

PMID25213117
OpenAlexW1993644183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.