Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25213001›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2014

Influence of pH control in the formation of inclusion bodies during production of recombinant sphingomyelinase-D in Escherichia coli.

Andrea Castellanos-Mendoza, Ricardo M Castro-Acosta, Alejandro Olvera, Guadalupe Zavala, Miguel Mendoza-Vera, Enrique García-Hernández, Alejandro Alagón, Mauricio A Trujillo-Roldán, Norma A Valdez-Cruz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Toxicity Profiling of Bacterial Inclusion Bodies in Human Caco-2 Cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. Coiled-Coil Based Inclusion Bodies and Their Potential Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. [Expression, purification and functional assessment of asprosin inclusion body].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea Castellanos-Mendoza
Ricardo M Castro-Acosta
Alejandro Olvera
Guadalupe Zavala
Miguel Mendoza-Vera
Enrique García-Hernández
Alejandro Alagón
Mauricio A Trujillo-Roldán
Norma A Valdez-Cruz
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInclusion bodies (IBs) are aggregated proteins that form clusters when protein is overexpressed in heterologous expression systems. IBs have been considered as non-usable proteins, but recently they are being used as functional materials, catalytic particles, drug delivery agents, immunogenic structures, and as a raw material in recombinant therapeutic protein purification. However, few studies have been made to understand how culture conditions affect the protein aggregation and the physicochemical characteristics that lead them to cluster. The objective of our research was to understand how pH affects the physicochemical properties of IBs formed by the recombinant sphingomyelinase-D of tick expressed in E. coli BL21-Gold (DE3) by evaluating two pH culture strategies.

resultsUncontrolled pH culture conditions favored recombinant sphingomyelinase-D aggregation and IB formation. The IBs of sphingomyelinase-D produced under controlled pH at 7.5 and after 24 h were smaller (<500 nm) than those produced under uncontrolled pH conditions (>500 nm). Furthermore, the composition, conformation and β-structure formation of the aggregates were different. Under controlled pH conditions in comparison to uncontrolled conditions, the produced IBs presented higher resistance to denaturants and proteinase-K degradation, presented β-structure, but apparently as time passes the IBs become compacted and less sensitive to amyloid dye binding.

conclusionsThe manipulation of the pH has an impact on IB formation and their physicochemical characteristics. Particularly, uncontrolled pH conditions favored the protein aggregation and sphingomyelinase-D IB formation. The evidence may lead to find methodologies for bioprocesses to obtain biomaterials with particular characteristics, extending the application possibilities of the inclusion bodies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzothiazolesBiomassCongo RedEndopeptidase KEscherichia coliGuanidineHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInclusion BodiesKineticsPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesRecombinant ProteinsSolubilitySpectrometry, FluorescenceThiazolesTicksBenzothiazolesCongo RedEndopeptidase KGuanidinePhosphoric Diester HydrolasesRecombinant Proteinssphingomyelin phosphodiesterase DThiazolesthioflavin T

Identifiers

PMID25213001
PMCPMC4177172
OpenAlexW2119573926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.