ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2014
Laboratory measurement of the anticoagulant activity of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants.
Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
141 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 442 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Guideline
- Effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin on the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2021Pooled it
- The Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban Compared with Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2021Pooled it
- Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review.Chest · 2017Pooled it
- Laboratory measurement of the anticoagulant activity of edoxaban: a systematic review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2015Pooled it
- Estimation of Rivaroxaban Plasma Concentrations in the Perioperative Setting in Patients With or Without Heparin Bridging.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018Trial
- Dabigatran plasma levels, aPTT and thromboelastography in patients with AF: implications for allowing early non-elective surgical procedures.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2017Trial
- Increased Thromboembolic Events With Dabigatran Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.Circulation. Heart failure · 2017Trial
- Clinical evaluation of laboratory methods to monitor exposure of rivaroxaban at trough and peak in patients with atrial fibrillation.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Trial
- Standardized use of novel oral anticoagulants plasma level thresholds in a new thrombolysis decision making protocol.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2016Trial
- Impact of postoperative weight loss on anticoagulant dosing after major lower limb amputation.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- Measuring Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Levels: Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Utilization of Apixaban Pharmacokinetics for Dose Optimization in High-Risk Elderly Patients.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Observational
- Re: Systematic Scoping on Point-of-care Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.European cardiology · 2026Article
- Perioperative management of colorectal surgical patients receiving a direct oral anticoagulant: a scoping review, particular emphasis on procedure-specific risks, and pharmacogenomics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary Expert Guidance for the Management of Severe Bleeding on Oral Anticoagulation: An Algorithm for Practicing Clinicians.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- Anticoagulation Failure in Stroke: Causes, Risk Factors, and Treatment.Journal of stroke · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors in Patients With Nephrotic Syndrome: Results From a National Retrospective Study.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025Review
- Rapid Determination of Xa Inhibitor Activity in Blood Using a Microfluidic Device that Measures Platelet Deposition and Fibrin Generation Under Flow.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) do not require routine laboratory monitoring. However, laboratory measurement may be desirable in special situations and populations.
objectivesThis study's objective was to systematically review and summarize current evidence regarding laboratory measurement of the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban.
methodsWe searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies that reported a relationship between drug levels of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban and coagulation assay results. Study quality was evaluated using QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2).
resultsWe identified 17 eligible studies for dabigatran, 15 for rivaroxaban, and 4 for apixaban. For dabigatran, a normal thrombin time excludes clinically relevant drug concentrations. The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) are less sensitive and may be normal at trough drug levels. The dilute thrombin time (R(2) = 0.92 to 0.99) and ecarin-based assays (R(2) = 0.92 to 1.00) show excellent linearity across on-therapy drug concentrations and may be used for drug quantification. For rivaroxaban and apixaban, anti-Xa activity is linear (R(2) = 0.89 to 1.00) over a wide range of drug levels and may be used for drug quantification. Undetectable anti-Xa activity likely excludes clinically relevant drug concentrations. The PT is less sensitive (especially for apixaban); a normal PT may not exclude clinically relevant levels. The APTT demonstrates insufficient sensitivity and linearity for quantification.
conclusionsDabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban exhibit variable effects on coagulation assays. Understanding these effects facilitates interpretation of test results in NOAC-treated patients. More information on the relationship between drug levels and clinical outcomes is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.