Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25211668›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2014

Associations of the fecal microbiome with urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women.

Barbara J Fuhrman, Heather Spencer Feigelson, Roberto Flores, Mitchell H Gail, Xia Xu, Jacques Ravel, James J Goedert

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01461070 (BRANCH), which is not on this map. Cited by 196 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
196citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01461070 completednot on this map

BRANCH:Fecal Microbiota Among Participants in a Pre-paid Health Plan

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2011 to 2020Enrolled175ConditionsBreast Neoplasms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

196 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 322 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Gut-Vagina Axis.Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

136 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara J FuhrmanDepartment of Epidemiology (B.J.F.), Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205; Divisions of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (B.J.F., R.F., N.H.G., J.J.G.) and Cancer Prevention (R.F.), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9704; Institute for Health Research (H.S.F.), Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado 80231; Cancer Research Technology Program (X.X.), Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland 21702; and Institute for Genome Sciences (J.R.), University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Heather Spencer Feigelson
Roberto Flores
Mitchell H Gail
Xia Xu
Jacques Ravel
James J Goedert
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsCancer Genetics (United States) · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Microbes and Human MalignanciesZIACP010214 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI VOGTMANN, EMILY · 2010 to 2021
$5.5M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe gut microbiota may influence the risk of breast cancer through effects on endogenous estrogens.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to investigate whether urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites are associated with the diversity and composition of the fecal microbiome. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a cross-sectional study among women enrolled in Kaiser Permanente of Colorado.

participantsA total of 60 women drawn from a random sample of healthy postmenopausal women (aged 55-69 y), without current or recent use of antibiotics or hormone therapy and no history of cancer or gastrointestinal disease participated in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES AND

methodsCreatinine-standardized urinary estrogens (estrone and estradiol) and 13 hydroxylated estrogen metabolites were measured in spot urines by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The fecal microbiome was assessed using pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons. General linear models were used to test for associations of diversity and composition of the fecal microbiome with parent estrogen (estrone + estradiol), total estrogens, and estrogen metabolites and the ratio of estrogen metabolites to parent estrogen, which has been predictive of postmenopausal breast cancer risk in previous studies.

resultsThe ratio of metabolites to parents was directly associated with whole-tree phylogenetic diversity (R = 0.35, P = .01). Relative abundances of the order Clostridiales (R = 0.32, P = .02) and the genus Bacteroides (R = -0.30, P = .03) were also correlated with the ratio of metabolites to parents. Associations were independent of age, body mass index, and study design factors.

conclusionsOur data suggest that women with a more diverse gut microbiome exhibit an elevated urinary ratio of hydroxylated estrogen metabolites to parent estrogen. Further research is warranted to confirm and relate these findings to clinical disease.

Indexed as

AgedBacteroidesClostridiumCross-Sectional StudiesEstrogensFecesFemaleHumansMicrobiotaMiddle AgedPostmenopauseEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID25211668
PMCPMC4255131
OpenAlexW2155634297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.