Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2014
HER2/neu testing in primary colorectal carcinoma.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2024 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Guideline
- Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of HER2 amplification, overexpression, and positivity in colorectal cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of chemotherapy-based therapies for previously treated advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for colorectal cancer: results from a validation study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2015Trial
- Absence of co-occurrence between HER2 amplification and dMMR/MSI in a large multicentric colorectal cancer cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Endoscopic features of deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high and BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer.DEN open · 2026Article
- Survival outcomes of ERBB2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of p53 and HER2 immunohistochemistry profiles in colorectal carcinoma.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2026Article
- Impact of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab or Anti-EGFRs: Exploratory Analysis of Eight Randomized Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Exploring Zanidatamab's efficacy across HER2-positive Malignancies: a narrative review.BMC cancer · 2025Review
- Genetic and transcriptomic analyses of early-onset colon cancer (EOCC): aESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- The impact of preoperative treatment on mismatch repair protein and HER2 expression in colorectal cancer: an analysis of paired samples.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Prognostic and Predictive Significance of Primary Tumor Localization and HER2 Expression in the Treatment of Patients with KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Single-Centre Experience from Serbia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Current and Emerging Treatment Paradigms in Colorectal Cancer: Integrating Hallmarks of Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- HER2-neu Expression and Survival in Colorectal Cancer in the South of Egypt; Immunohistochemistry and Genetic Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- RAS/RAF mutations and microsatellite instability status in primary colorectal cancers according to HER2 amplification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Unleashing the power of anti-HER2 therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: paving the way for a brighter future.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-HER2/neu therapy is well-established in breast and gastric carcinoma. The increased understanding of this pathway led to the identification of new promising drugs in addition to trastuzumab, offering further perspectives. The role of HER2/neu in colorectal carcinoma is controversially discussed, as discrepant data has been reported.
methodsHere, we retrospectively assessed the prevalence of HER2/neu positivity in a large series of colorectal carcinoma, testing HER2/neu status according to current recommendations. We correlated the results to clinico-pathological data and patient survival.
resultsOverall, in 1645 primary colorectal carcinoma cases, 1.6% of the cases were HER2/neu positive. HER2/neu positivity significantly correlated with higher UICC stages (P=0.017) and lymph node metastases (P=0.029). In the subgroup of sigmoideal and rectal carcinomas, positive HER2/neu status was associated with T-category (P=0.041) and higher UICC stages (P=0.022). Although statistically not significant, HER2/neu-positive colorectal carcinomas displayed a tendency to poorer overall survival.
conclusionsThese results illustrate the importance of testing HER2/neu by approved diagnostic techniques and scoring systems. We assume that although the prevalence of HER2/neu positivity in colorectal carcinoma is low, HER2/neu testing in advanced, nodal-positive colorectal carcinoma is reasonable, offering a potential target in high risk colorectal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.