ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2014
A comparison of radiation dose between standard and 3D angiography in congenital heart disease.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Down to earth - A new type of hygiene.Biomedical journal · 2023Article
- Multimodality 3D image fusion with live fluoroscopy reduces radiation dose during catheterization of congenital heart defects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography during Catheterization of Congenital Heart Disease - A ten Years' experience at a single center.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation.Korean circulation journal · 2020Review
- Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: A Literature Review.Pediatric cardiology · 2019Review
- Pros, cons and future perspectives - three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2019Review
- Dramatic Dose Reduction in Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography After Implementation of a Simple Dose Reduction Protocol.Pediatric cardiology · 2018Article
- Radiation Dosimetry of 3D Rotational Neuroangiography and 2D-DSA in Children.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Recent advances in cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease.F1000Research · 2018Review
- Radiation Exposure by Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography (3DRA) During Trans-catheter Melody Pulmonary Valve Procedures (TMPV) in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.Pediatric cardiology · 2016Article
- Three-dimensional rotational angiography in children with an aortic coarctation.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) to assess patients with congenital heart diseases appears to be a promising technique despite the scarce literature available.
objectivesThe objective of this study was to describe our initial experience with 3D-RA and to compare its radiation dose to that of standard two-dimensional angiography (2D-SA).
methodsBetween September 2011 and April 2012, 18 patients underwent simultaneous 3D-RA and 2D-SA during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Radiation dose was assessed using the dose-area-product (DAP).
resultsThe median patient age and weight were 12.5 years and 47.5 Kg, respectively. The median DAP of each 3D-RA acquisition was 1093µGy.m2 and 190µGy.m2 for each 2D-SA acquisition (p<0.01). In patients weighing more than 45Kg (n=7), this difference was attenuated but still significant (1525 µGy.m2 vs.413µGy.m2, p=0.01). No difference was found between one 3D-RA and three 2D-SA (1525µGy.m2 vs.1238 µGy.m2, p = 0.575) in this population. This difference was significantly higher in patients weighing less than 45Kg (n=9) (713µGy.m2 vs.81µGy.m2, P = 0.008), even when comparing one 3D-RA with three 2D-SA (242µGy.m2, respectively, p<0.008). 3D-RA was extremely useful for the assessment of conduits of univentricular hearts, tortuous branches of the pulmonary artery, and aorta relative to 2D-SA acquisitions.
conclusionsThe radiation dose of 3D-RA used in our institution was higher than those previously reported in the literature and this difference was more evident in children. This type of assessment is of paramount importance when starting to perform 3D-RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.