Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210927›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Postoperative serum levels of sCD26 for surveillance in colorectal cancer patients.

Loretta De Chiara, Ana M Rodríguez-Piñeiro, Oscar J Cordero, Lidia Vázquez-Tuñas, Daniel Ayude, Francisco J Rodríguez-Berrocal, María Páez de la Cadena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Serum CD26 in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DPPIV/CD26: a tumor suppressor or a marker of malignancy?Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Loretta De ChiaraDepartamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Ana M Rodríguez-PiñeiroDepartamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Oscar J CorderoDepartmento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Edificio CIBUS, Campus Vida, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Lidia Vázquez-TuñasServicio de Oncología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Daniel AyudeDepartamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Francisco J Rodríguez-BerrocalDepartamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
María Páez de la CadenaDepartamento de Bioquímica, Genética e Inmunología, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Universidade de Vigo · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity Hospital Complex Of Vigo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main aims of the follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer is the early detection and treatment of tumor recurrence. We previously demonstrated decreased preoperative soluble CD26 (sCD26) levels in serum from colorectal cancer patients. We extended now the study to investigate if sCD26 levels in postoperative serum serve as marker of recurrence of the disease during surveillance. Soluble sCD26 was measured in pre- and postoperative serum samples of 43 patients with primary colorectal cancer. Carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19.9 and 72.4 levels were also measured during surveillance. The average follow-up period was 41.8 ± 20.8 months. sCD26 levels during follow-up showed well-defined patterns in patients without disease (n = 28), and in patients with tumor persistence (n = 2), local recurrence (n = 3) or distant metastasis (n = 10). Disease-free patients showed stable levels between 460-850 ng/mL during follow-up, while high (over 850 ng/mL) and unstable sCD26 levels were found before recurrence was diagnosed. The mean maximum/minimum sCD26 ratios during surveillance were 1.52, 2.12 and 2.63 for patients with no recurrence, local recurrence and metastasis, respectively (p = 0.005). From the cut-off obtained from a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve built with the maximum/minimum sCD26 ratios and the upper and lower cut-offs of sCD26, we were able to discriminate patients with and without recurrent disease. We propose that the measurement of serum sCD26 during the follow-up of patients diagnosed of colorectal cancer could be valuable for the early detection of local and distant recurrence. A large, randomized, prospective trial should be performed to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDipeptidyl Peptidase 4FemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorDipeptidyl Peptidase 4DPP4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25210927
PMCPMC4161426
OpenAlexW2014125068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.