Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210814›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2014

Self-reported diabetes in older people: comparison of prevalences and control measures.

Sheila Rizzato Stopa, Chester Luiz Galvão César, Neuber José Segri, Moisés Goldbaum, Vanessa Martins Valente Guimarães, Maria Cecília Goi Porto Alves, Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Social inequalities in care for the elderly with diabetes in Brazil.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sheila Rizzato StopaFaculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Chester Luiz Galvão CésarDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Neuber José SegriDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brasil.
Moisés GoldbaumDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Vanessa Martins Valente GuimarãesEscola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maria Cecília Goi Porto AlvesInstituto de Saúde, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marilisa Berti de Azevedo BarrosDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Universidade Brasil · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRSecretaria da Saúde · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence of diabetes in older people and the adopted control measures.

methodsData regarding older diabetic individuals who participated in the Health Surveys conducted in the Municipality of Sao Paulo, SP, ISA-Capital, in 2003 and 2008, which were cross-sectional studies, were analyzed. Prevalences and confidence intervals were compared between 2003 and 2008, according to sociodemographic variables. The combination of the databases was performed when the confidence intervals overlapped. The Chi-square (level of significance of 5%) and the Pearson's Chi-square (Rao-Scott) tests were performed. The variables without overlap between the confidence intervals were not tested.

resultsThe age of the older adults was 60-69 years. The majority were women, Caucasian, with an income of between > 0.5 and 2.5 times the minimum salary and low levels of schooling. The prevalence of diabetes was 17.6% (95%CI 14.9;20.6) in 2003 and 20.1% (95%CI 17.3;23.1) in 2008, which indicates a growth over this period (p at the limit of significance). The most prevalent measure adopted by the older adults to control diabetes was hypoglycemic agents, followed by diet. Physical activity was not frequent, despite the significant differences observed between 2003 and 2008 results. The use of public health services to control diabetes was significantly higher in older individuals with lower income and lower levels of education.

conclusionsDiabetes is a complex and challenging disease for patients and the health systems. Measures that encourage health promotion practices are necessary because they presented a smaller proportion than the use of hypoglycemic agents. Public health policies should be implemented, and aimed mainly at older individuals with low income and schooling levels. These changes are essential to improve the health condition of older diabetic patients.

Indexed as

AgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusDiet TherapyFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth SurveysHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSelf ReportSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25210814
PMCPMC4181106
OpenAlexW2002776901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.