Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210742›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A Delphi process to optimize quality and performance of drug evaluation in neonates.

Frederic Legrand, Rym Boulkedid, Valery Elie, Stephanie Leroux, Elizabeth Valls, Adolfo Valls-i-Soler, Johannes N Van den Anker, Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frederic LegrandAP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Inserm CIC 9202 (Centre d'Investigation Clinique pédiatrique), University Diderot Paris VII, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
Rym BoulkedidAP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Unité de Recherche Clinique (URC), Inserm CIE5 (Centre d'Investigation clinique Epidémiologie clinique), Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
Valery ElieAP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Inserm CIC 9202 (Centre d'Investigation Clinique pédiatrique), University Diderot Paris VII, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
Stephanie LerouxAP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Inserm CIC 9202 (Centre d'Investigation Clinique pédiatrique), University Diderot Paris VII, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
Elizabeth VallsUniversity of Basque country, Head Neonatal Intensive care Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo-Bilbao, Spain.
Adolfo Valls-i-SolerUniversity of Basque country, Head Neonatal Intensive care Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo-Bilbao, Spain.
Johannes N Van den AnkerEvan and Cindy Jones Professor of Paediatric Clinical Pharmacology Chief, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Evelyne Jacqz-AigrainAP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Inserm CIC 9202 (Centre d'Investigation Clinique pédiatrique), University Diderot Paris VII, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal trials remain difficult to conduct for several reasons: in particular the need for study sites to have an existing infrastructure in place, with trained investigators and validated quality procedures to ensure good clinical, laboratory practices and a respect for high ethical standards. The objective of this work was to identify the major criteria considered necessary for selecting neonatal intensive care units that are able to perform drug evaluations competently. METHODOLOGY AND MAIN

findingsThis Delphi process was conducted with an international multidisciplinary panel of 25 experts from 13 countries, selected to be part of two committees (a scientific committee and an expert committee), in order to validate criteria required to perform drug evaluation in neonates. Eighty six items were initially selected and classified under 7 headings: "NICUs description-Level of care" (21), "Ability to perform drug trials: NICU organization and processes (15), "Research Experience" (12), "Scientific competencies and area of expertise" (8), "Quality Management" (16), "Training and educational capacity" (8) and "Public involvement" (6). Sixty-one items were retained and headings were rearranged after the first round, 34 were selected after the second round. A third round was required to validate 13 additional items. The final set includes 47 items divided under 5 headings.

conclusionA set of 47 relevant criteria will help to NICUs that want to implement, conduct or participate in drug trials within a neonatal network identify important issues to be aware of. SUMMARY POINTS: 1) Neonatal trials remain difficult to conduct for several reasons: in particular the need for study sites to have an existing infrastructure in place, with trained investigators and validated quality procedures to ensure good clinical, laboratory practices and a respect for high ethical standards. 2) The present Delphi study was conducted with an international multidisciplinary panel of 25 experts from 13 countries and aims to identify the major criteria considered necessary for selecting neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) that are able to perform drug evaluations competently. 3) Of the 86 items initially selected and classified under 7 headings--"NICUs description-Level of care" (21), "Ability to perform drug trials: NICU organization and processes (15), "Research Experience" (12), "Scientific competencies and area of expertise" (8), "Quality Management" (16), "Training and educational capacity" (8) and "Public involvement" (6)--47 items were selected following a three rounds Delphi process. 4) The present consensus will help NICUs to implement, conduct or participate in drug trials within a neonatal network.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueDrug EvaluationPhysiciansAdultClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPharmacology

Identifiers

PMID25210742
PMCPMC4161344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.