Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210712›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2014

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT scanning in diagnosing vascular prosthetic graft infection.

Ben R Saleem, Robert A Pol, Riemer H J A Slart, Michel M P J Reijnen, Clark J Zeebregts

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Variability of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Difficult diagnosis and management of a complicated Nellix graft infection.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How useful is 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected vascular graft infection?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Diagnostic yield ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Mimics of Complications in the Postsurgical Aorta at CT.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Textural features ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ben R SaleemDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robert A PolDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Riemer H J A SlartNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michel M P J ReijnenDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, P.O. Box 9555, 6800 TA Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Clark J ZeebregtsDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLRijnstate Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular prosthetic graft infection (VPGI) is a severe complication after vascular surgery. CT-scan is considered the diagnostic tool of choice in advanced VPGI. The incidence of a false-negative result using CT is relatively high, especially in the presence of low-grade infections. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) scanning has been suggested as an alternative for the diagnosis and assessment of infectious processes. Hybrid (18)F-FDG PET/CT has established the role of (18)F-FDG PET for the assessment of suspected VPGI, providing accurate anatomic localization of the site of infection. However, there are no clear guidelines for the interpretation of the uptake patterns of (18)F-FDG as clinical tool for VPGI. Based on the available literature it is suggested that a linear, diffuse, and homogeneous uptake should not be regarded as an infection whereas focal or heterogeneous uptake with a projection over the vessel on CT is highly suggestive of infection. Nevertheless, (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FDG PET/CT can play an important role in the detection of VPGI and monitoring response to treatment. However an accurate uptake and pattern recognition is warranted and cut-off uptake values and patterns need to be standardized before considering the technique to be the new standard.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedBlood Vessel ProsthesisCommunicable DiseasesFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansProsthesis-Related InfectionsTransplantsFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID25210712
PMCPMC4156987
OpenAlexW2014075807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.