ArticlePeerJ2014
Disease dynamics and potential mitigation among restored and wild staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis.
Article in PeerJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restoration stocks of a caribbean coral species contain low levels of inherent stony coral tissue loss disease resistance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genotypes of Acropora cervicornis in Florida show resistance to either elevated nutrients or disease, but not both in combination.PloS one · 2025Article
- Tank-based bacterial profiling identifies basin-wide white band disease pathogen candidate and no bacterial associations with coral disease resistance.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Building living systematic reviews and reporting standards for comparative microscopic analysis of white diseases in hard corals.Ecology and evolution · 2024Review
- Assessing Molecular Localization of Symbiont Microalgae in Coral Branches Through Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Removal of detritivore sea cucumbers from reefs increases coral disease.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Shifts in the coral microbiome in response toApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Mixtures of genotypes increase disease resistance in a coral nursery.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Stony coral tissue loss disease decimated Caribbean coral populations and reshaped reef functionality.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Phosphate enrichment induces increased dominance of the parasite Aquarickettsia in the coral Acropora cervicornis.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2022Article
- The coral symbiont Candidatus Aquarickettsia is variably abundant in threatened Caribbean acroporids and transmitted horizontally.The ISME journal · 2022Article
- Infection Patterns and Fitness Effects ofInsects · 2020Article
- Parasitic 'Candidatus Aquarickettsia rohweri' is a marker of disease susceptibility in Acropora cervicornis but is lost during thermal stress.Environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Treatment of Coral Wounds by Combining an Antiseptic Bilayer Film and an Injectable Antioxidant Biopolymer.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Spatial distribution of microbial communities among colonies and genotypes in nursery-rearedPeerJ · 2020Article
- Growth dynamics inPeerJ · 2020Article
- Microbiome differences in disease-resistant vs. susceptible Acropora corals subjected to disease challenge assays.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Considerations for maximizing the adaptive potential of restored coral populations in the western Atlantic.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2019Article
- Phylogenetic, genomic, and biogeographic characterization of a novel and ubiquitous marine invertebrate-associated Rickettsiales parasite, Candidatus Aquarickettsia rohweri, gen. nov., sp. nov.The ISME journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The threatened status (both ecologically and legally) of Caribbean staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis, has prompted rapidly expanding efforts in culture and restocking, although tissue loss diseases continue to affect populations. In this study, disease surveillance and histopathological characterization were used to compare disease dynamics and conditions in both restored and extant wild populations. Disease had devastating effects on both wild and restored populations, but dynamics were highly variable and appeared to be site-specific with no significant differences in disease prevalence between wild versus restored sites. A subset of 20 haphazardly selected colonies at each site observed over a four-month period revealed widely varying disease incidence, although not between restored and wild sites, and a case fatality rate of 8%. A tropical storm was the only discernable environmental trigger associated with a consistent spike in incidence across all sites. Lastly, two field mitigation techniques, (1) excision of apparently healthy branch tips from a diseased colony, and (2) placement of a band of epoxy fully enclosing the diseased margin, gave equivocal results with no significant benefit detected for either treatment compared to controls. Tissue condition of associated samples was fair to very poor; unsuccessful mitigation treatment samples had severe degeneration of mesenterial filament cnidoglandular bands. Polyp mucocytes in all samples were infected with suspect rickettsia-like organisms; however, no bacterial aggregates were found. No histological differences were found between disease lesions with gross signs fitting literature descriptions of white-band disease (WBD) and rapid tissue loss (RTL). Overall, our results do not support differing disease quality, quantity, dynamics, nor health management strategies between restored and wild colonies of A. cervicornis in the Florida Keys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.