Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210650›Full record

ArticleCellular logistics2014

Tracking of the dynamic localization of the Rab-specific HOPS subunits reveal their distinct interaction with Ypt7 and vacuoles.

Kathrin Auffarth, Henning Arlt, Jens Lachmann, Margarita Cabrera, Christian Ungermann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular logistics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Arf1 orchestrates Rab GTPase conversion at theMolecular biology of the cell · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The NaMolecular biology of the cell · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathrin AuffarthBiochemistry section; Department of Biology/Chemistry; University of Osnabrück; Osnabrück, Germany.
Henning ArltBiochemistry section; Department of Biology/Chemistry; University of Osnabrück; Osnabrück, Germany.
Jens LachmannBiochemistry section; Department of Biology/Chemistry; University of Osnabrück; Osnabrück, Germany.
Margarita CabreraBiochemistry section; Department of Biology/Chemistry; University of Osnabrück; Osnabrück, Germany.
Christian UngermannBiochemistry section; Department of Biology/Chemistry; University of Osnabrück; Osnabrück, Germany.
Osnabrück University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endosomal and vacuole fusion depends on the two homologous tethering complexes CORVET and HOPS. HOPS binds the activated Rab GTPase Ypt7 via two distinct subunits, Vps39 and Vps41. To understand the participation and possible polarity of Vps41 and Vps39 during tethering, we used an in vivo approach. For this, we established the ligand-induced relocalization to the plasma membrane, using the Mon1-Ccz1 GEF complex that activates Ypt7 on endosomes. We then employed slight overexpression to compare the mobility of the HOPS-specific Vps41 and Vps39 subunits during this process. Our data indicate an asymmetry in the Rab-specific interaction of the two HOPS subunits: Vps39 is more tightly bound to the vacuole, and relocalizes the entire vacuole to the plasma membrane, whereas Vps41 behaved like the more mobile subunit. This is due to their specific Rab binding, as the mobility of both subunits was similar in

Indexed as

endosomeHOPStethering complexvacuoleVps39Vps41

Identifiers

PMID25210650
PMCPMC4156483
OpenAlexW2073618225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.