Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210629›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pregnancy2014

Comparison of the effects of maternal supportive care and acupressure (BL32 acupoint) on pregnant women's pain intensity and delivery outcome.

Marzieh Akbarzadeh, Zahra Masoudi, Mohammad Javad Hadianfard, Maryam Kasraeian, Najaf Zare

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pregnancy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Continuous support for women during childbirth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marzieh AkbarzadehCommunity Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 71345-1359, Shiraz 71936 13119, Iran.
Zahra MasoudiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 71345-1359, Shiraz 71936 13119, Iran.
Mohammad Javad HadianfardDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 71345-1359, Shiraz 71936 13119, Iran.
Maryam KasraeianMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 71345-1359, Shiraz 71936 13119, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1716-6950
Najaf ZareDepartment of Biostatistics, Infertility Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 71345-1359, Shiraz 71936 13119, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0338-0622
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery is considered as one of the most painful experiences of women's life. The present study aimed to compare the effects of supportive care and acupressure on the pregnant women's pain intensity and delivery outcome. In this experimental study, 150 pregnant women were randomly divided into supportive care, acupressure, and control groups. The intensity of pain was measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The supportive care group received both physical and emotional cares. In the acupressure group, on the other hand, BL32 acupoint was pressed during the contractions. Then, the data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results revealed significant difference among the three groups regarding the intensity of pain after the intervention (P < 0.001). Besides, the highest rate of natural vaginal delivery was observed in the supportive care group (94%) and the acupressure group (92%), while the highest rate of cesarean delivery was related to the control group (40%) and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The results showed that maternal supportive care and acupressure during labor reduced the intensity of pain and improved the delivery outcomes. Therefore, these methods can be introduced to the medical team as effective strategies for decreasing delivery pain. This trial is registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial Code IRCT2014011011706N5.

Indexed as

AcupressureAdolescentAdultCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansLabor PainPain MeasurementPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25210629
PMCPMC4152932
OpenAlexW2123916555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.