ArticleCommunicative & integrative biology2013
The innate immune system as mediator of systemic DNA damage responses.
Article in Communicative & integrative biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the current landscape and future perspectives.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Informing the Cannabis Conjecture: From Life's Beginnings to Mitochondria, Membranes and the Electrome-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Impact of Hormesis, Neuronal Stress Response, and Reproduction, upon Clinical Aging: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Protecting the future: balancing proteostasis for reproduction.Trends in cell biology · 2022Review
- Low dose ionizing radiation effects on the immune system.Environment international · 2021Review
- Activating the DNA Damage Response and Suppressing Innate Immunity: Human Papillomaviruses Walk the Line.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Ageing Throughout History: The Evolution of Human Lifespan.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020Review
- Genetic and cellular sensitivity ofDisease models & mechanisms · 2018Article
- Insights from the worm: the C. elegans model for innate immunity.Seminars in immunology · 2014Review
- Systemic DNA damage responses: organismal adaptations to genome instability.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA damage causally contributes to cancer development and tissue degeneration with aging.(1) Cellular DNA damage responses (DDR) mediate cell cycle arrest to allow time for DNA repair, or induce cellular senescence and apoptosis to eliminate damaged cells.(2) In contrast to cell-autonomous DNA damage responses, it remains less clear how organisms respond to genome instability in certain cell types and how distinct tissues interact when responding to tissue-specific DNA damage. C. elegans comprises an intriguing system to study the interaction between distinct tissues as germ cells evoke conserved DDR mechanisms, while somatic tissues are highly radio resistant.(3) (,) (4) The recent discovery of the "germline DNA damage-induced systemic stress response" (GDISR) sheds new light on non-cell autonomous responses to genome instability.(5) GDISR is mediated by ERK MAP kinase MPK-1 induced putative secreted peptides that are associated with innate immunity. The innate immune response leads to activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome-system (UPS) in somatic tissues, which confers systemic stress resistance. We discuss the role of the innate immunity in mediating systemic DNA damage responses and how UPS activity promotes endurance of somatic tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.