ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2014
Time perception: the bad news and the good.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of valence, arousal, stimulus type, and temporal paradigm in the effect of emotion on time perception: A meta-analysis.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Pooled it
- The role of low-frequency rTMS in the superior parietal cortex during time estimation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019Trial
- Predictive processing in time perception: Assessing prediction error minimization in the sub-second range.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Psychobiological and Metabolic Correlates of Time Perception in Humans: An Exploratory Study.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Interferences between time and space in advanced age.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Time, space, memory and brain-body rhythms.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- The Role of Spontaneous Eye Blinks in Temporal Perception: An Eye Tracking Study.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Article
- An investigation of the feeling that an inter-turn silence has lasted too long.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- VNTR Polymorphisms in theBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Time Dilation in Motivational Congruence Theory's Paradigm.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2025Article
- When time slows down: temporal distortion and addictive social media use.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Perception of temporal structure in speech is influenced by body movement and individual beat perception ability.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Measuring the perception and metacognition of time.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Examining racial differences in the network structure and properties of specific cognitive domains among older adults.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Coordinate-Based Meta-Analyses of the Time Perception Network.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Creating a Home for Timing Researchers: Then, Now, and the Future.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Same principle, but different computations in representing time and space.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- What's next?: Time is subjectively dilated not only for 'oddball' events, but also for events immediately after oddballs.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Time perception and pain: Can a temporal illusion reduce the intensity of pain?Learning & behavior · 2023Article
- Rhythm-based assessment and training for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a feasibility study protocol.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time perception is fundamental and heavily researched, but the field faces a number of obstacles to theoretical progress. In this advanced review, we focus on three pieces of 'bad news' for time perception research: temporal perception is highly labile across changes in experimental context and task; there are pronounced individual differences not just in overall performance but in the use of different timing strategies and the effect of key variables; and laboratory studies typically bear little relation to timing in the 'real world'. We describe recent examples of these issues and in each case offer some 'good news' by showing how new research is addressing these challenges to provide rich insights into the neural and information-processing bases of timing and time perception. WIREs Cogn Sci 2014, 5:429-446. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1298 This article is categorized under: Psychology > Perception and Psychophysics Neuroscience > Cognition.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.