Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210478›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology : advances and applications2014

Reducing medication errors in critical care: a multimodal approach.

Rachel M Kruer, Andrew S Jarrell, Asad Latif

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Automation of in-hospital pharmacy dispensing: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Where is my infusion pump? Harnessing network dynamics for improved hospital equipment fleet management.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacists in Critical Care.Innovations in pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Prescribing pattern of interns: Time for new interventions.Journal of basic and clinical pharmacy · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel M KruerDepartment of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrew S JarrellDepartment of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Asad LatifDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA ; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins Hospital · USNational Patient Safety Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine has reported that medication errors are the single most common type of error in health care, representing 19% of all adverse events, while accounting for over 7,000 deaths annually. The frequency of medication errors in adult intensive care units can be as high as 947 per 1,000 patient-days, with a median of 105.9 per 1,000 patient-days. The formulation of drugs is a potential contributor to medication errors. Challenges related to drug formulation are specific to the various routes of medication administration, though errors associated with medication appearance and labeling occur among all drug formulations and routes of administration. Addressing these multifaceted challenges requires a multimodal approach. Changes in technology, training, systems, and safety culture are all strategies to potentially reduce medication errors related to drug formulation in the intensive care unit.

Indexed as

drug designdrug formulationmedication safetypatient safety

Identifiers

PMID25210478
PMCPMC4155993
OpenAlexW2007651438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.