Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210177›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2014

Prime-boost immunization strategies against Chikungunya virus.

David Hallengärd, Fok-Moon Lum, Beate M Kümmerer, Aleksei Lulla, Valeria Lulla, Juan García-Arriaza, John K Fazakerley, Pierre Roques, Roger Le Grand, Andres Merits and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

David HallengärdDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden david.hallengard@ki.se peter.liljestrom@ki.se.
Fok-Moon LumSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Biopolis, Singapore Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore.
Beate M KümmererUniversity of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany.
Aleksei LullaInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Valeria LullaInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Juan García-ArriazaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
John K FazakerleyInstitute of Virology, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, United Kingdom.
Pierre RoquesDivision of Immuno-Virology, iMETI, CEA, Paris, France UMR-E1, University Paris-Sud XI, Orsay, France.
Roger Le GrandDivision of Immuno-Virology, iMETI, CEA, Paris, France.
Andres MeritsInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Lisa F P NgSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Biopolis, Singapore Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore.
Mariano EstebanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
Peter LiljeströmDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden david.hallengard@ki.se peter.liljestrom@ki.se.
University of Tartu · EECommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRKarolinska Institutet · SENational University of Singapore · SGCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESThe Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledChikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a reemerging mosquito-borne alphavirus that causes debilitating arthralgia in humans. Here we describe the development and testing of novel DNA replicon and protein CHIKV vaccine candidates and evaluate their abilities to induce antigen-specific immune responses against CHIKV. We also describe homologous and heterologous prime-boost immunization strategies using novel and previously developed CHIKV vaccine candidates. Immunogenicity and efficacy were studied in a mouse model of CHIKV infection and showed that the DNA replicon and protein antigen were potent vaccine candidates, particularly when used for priming and boosting, respectively. Several prime-boost immunization strategies eliciting unmatched humoral and cellular immune responses were identified. Further characterization by antibody epitope mapping revealed differences in the qualitative immune responses induced by the different vaccine candidates and immunization strategies. Most vaccine modalities resulted in complete protection against wild-type CHIKV infection; however, we did identify circumstances under which certain immunization regimens may lead to enhancement of inflammation upon challenge. These results should help guide the design of CHIKV vaccine studies and will form the basis for further preclinical and clinical evaluation of these vaccine candidates. IMPORTANCE: As of today, there is no licensed vaccine to prevent CHIKV infection. In considering potential new vaccine candidates, a vaccine that could raise long-term protective immunity after a single immunization would be preferable. While humoral immunity seems to be central for protection against CHIKV infection, we do not yet fully understand the correlates of protection. Therefore, in the absence of a functional vaccine, there is a need to evaluate a number of different candidates, assessing their merits when they are used either in a single immunization or in a homologous or heterologous prime-boost modality. Here we show that while single immunization with various vaccine candidates results in potent responses, combined approaches significantly enhance responses, suggesting that such approaches need to be considered in the further development of an efficacious CHIKV vaccine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImmunizationLeukocytes, MononuclearMice, Inbred C57BLSurvival AnalysisVaccines, DNAViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralVaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25210177
PMCPMC4249109
OpenAlexW2104296094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.