Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25210070›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Evaluation of the Alere I influenza A&B nucleic acid amplification test by use of respiratory specimens collected in viral transport medium.

J Jeremiah Bell, Rangaraj Selvarangan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Improved performances of the second generation of the ID NOW influenza A&B 2® and comparison with the GeneXpert®.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cost-Effective Respiratory Virus Testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Are Rapid Influenza Antigen Tests Still Clinically Useful in Today's Molecular Diagnostics World?Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pathology Consultation on Influenza Diagnostics.American journal of clinical pathology · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Jeremiah BellChildren's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Rangaraj SelvaranganChildren's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, USA University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA rselvarangan@cmh.edu.
University of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Alere i Influenza A&B assay is a newly developed rapid molecular assay which has the potential to generate results within 15 min from sample collection. In this study, we evaluated the Alere i Influenza A&B assay by using salvaged frozen respiratory specimens that were collected in viral transport medium from children ages 10 months to 19 years. Alere i Influenza A&B assay test results were compared with viral culture and ProFlu(+) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay results. We found that the overall sensitivity and specificity of the Alere i Influenza A&B assay were 93.3% and 94.5% for the detection of influenza A virus and 100% and 100% for the detection of influenza B virus, respectively, compared to viral culture. In comparison to ProFlu(+) real-time RT-PCR, overall sensitivity and specificity of the Alere i Influenza A&B assay for the detection of influenza A virus were 88.8% and 98.3% and 100% and 100% for detecting influenza B virus. Overall, the Alere i Influenza A&B assay performed well compared to either virus cell culture or RT-PCR.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfluenza A virusInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingVirus CultivationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25210070
PMCPMC4313236
OpenAlexW1977948852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.