Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25209852›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2014

What explains functioning from the perspective of people with multiple sclerosis?

Andrea Conrad, Michaela Coenen, Jürg Kesselring, Alarcos Cieza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea ConradDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology-IBE, Pettenkofer School of Public Health (PSPH LMU), Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Michaela Coenen
Jürg Kesselring
Alarcos Cieza

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for MS was developed to capture functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study examined whether categories in the Brief ICF Core Set for MS best capture different levels of functioning in pwMS. We used data of a multicenter cross-sectional study collected from 205 pwMS using the ICF categories of the MS-specific WHO ICF Checklist and the individual rating of functioning. ICF categories to be entered in an initial regression model were selected following a systematic procedure in accordance with the ICF structure. Based on the initial regression model using stepwise Ordinary Least-Squares regression analyses, additional models were designed by substituting the ICF categories in final model. The selected set of categories was compared with the Brief ICF Core Set for MS. Eleven ICF categories were identified that best differentiate among different levels of functioning. Four were part of the Brief ICF Core Set. ICF categories identified in this study may be used as outcome measures in further study, parameters to monitor functioning along the continuum of health care and lifespan, and to define different subgroups of pwMS.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisRegression AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.