Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25209524›Full record

Trial reportTobacco control2016

Smokers with serious mental illness and requests for nicotine replacement therapy post-hospitalisation.

Rachel K Schuck, Audun Dahl, Sharon M Hall, Kevin Delucchi, Sebastien C Fromont, Stephen E Hall, Thomas Bonas, Judith J Prochaska

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tobacco control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00968513 (Evaluation of Tobacco Treatment Strategies for Inpatient Psychiatry), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00968513 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Tobacco Treatment Strategies for Inpatient Psychiatry

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2009 to 2015Enrolled956ConditionsTobacco DependenceArmsBrief Intervention, Extended Treatment, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel K SchuckDepartment of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Audun DahlDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Sharon M HallDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Kevin DelucchiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sebastien C FromontDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stephen E HallDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Thomas BonasAlta Bates Summit Medical Center, Herrick Hospital, Berkeley, California, USA.
Judith J ProchaskaDepartment of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

TREATMENTS FOR COMPLEX PATIENTS IN NEW SETTINGSP50DA009253 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SORENSEN, JAMES L · 1994 to 2014
$28.2M
Evaluation of Tobacco Treatment Strategies for Inpatient PsychiatryR01MH083684 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PROCHASKA, JUDITH J. · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
Treatment of Complex Patients: Emphasis on NicotineK05DA016752 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HALL, SHARON M. · 2003 to 2012
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA016752NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009253NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA09253NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSmoke-free psychiatric hospitalisation provides opportunity for initiating tobacco cessation treatment. The current study reports on psychiatric patients' interest in continuing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) posthospitalisation and examines patient predictors of NRT requests, quit attempts and abstinence at 1-week follow-up.

methodsDaily smokers were recruited and interviewed on locked psychiatric units at three smoke-free San Francisco Bay Area hospitals. Intent to quit smoking was not required to participate and 73% of eligible smokers enrolled. Analyses focused on 816 participants (49% female) randomised to interventions providing counselling tailored to readiness to quit with availability of NRT posthospitalisation. Logistic regressions tested demographic, smoking and psychiatric factors predictive of NRT requests, quit attempts and abstinence 1-week postdischarge.

resultsParticipants averaged 17 (SD=10) cigarettes/day for an average of 19 (SD=14) years. Most (88%) requested study-provided NRT (74% right at discharge). Participants preparing to quit and those with more severe psychiatric symptoms were more likely to request NRT at discharge (p<0.01). Those with more severe psychiatric symptoms also were more likely to request NRT refill, as were older participants (p<0.05). Participants who requested NRT at discharge were more likely to make a 24 h quit attempt and self-report abstinence at the 1-week follow-up (54% quit attempt, 14% abstinent) than participants who did not (25% quit attempt, 4% abstinent) (p<0.05).

conclusionsThe great demand for NRT and the association between NRT use with quit attempts and abstinence at 1-week posthospitalisation supports adoption of tobacco treatment in acute psychiatric settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: # NCT00968513.

Indexed as

Tobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultFemaleHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSmokingAddictionCessationNicotinePriority/special populations

Identifiers

PMID25209524
PMCPMC5110429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.