Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25209147›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

High-efficiency genome editing and allele replacement in prototrophic and wild strains of Saccharomyces.

William G Alexander, Drew T Doering, Chris Todd Hittinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Synthetic hybrids of six yeast species.Nature communications · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Hybridization and adaptive evolution of diverseBiotechnology for biofuels · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Horizontally acquired genes in early-diverging pathogenic fungi enable the use of host nucleosides and nucleotides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William G AlexanderLaboratory of Genetics, Genome Center of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Energy Institute, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Drew T DoeringLaboratory of Genetics, Genome Center of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Energy Institute, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Chris Todd HittingerLaboratory of Genetics, Genome Center of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Energy Institute, J. F. Crow Institute for the Study of Evolution, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 cthittinger@wisc.edu.
Energy Center of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS 5T32HG002760NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current genome editing techniques available for Saccharomyces yeast species rely on auxotrophic markers, limiting their use in wild and industrial strains and species. Taking advantage of the ancient loss of thymidine kinase in the fungal kingdom, we have developed the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene as a selectable and counterselectable marker that forms the core of novel genome engineering tools called the H: aploid E: ngineering and R: eplacement P: rotocol (HERP) cassettes. Here we show that these cassettes allow a researcher to rapidly generate heterogeneous populations of cells with thousands of independent chromosomal allele replacements using mixed PCR products. We further show that the high efficiency of this approach enables the simultaneous replacement of both alleles in diploid cells. Using these new techniques, many of the most powerful yeast genetic manipulation strategies are now available in wild, industrial, and other prototrophic strains from across the diverse Saccharomyces genus.

Indexed as

AllelesCell DifferentiationChromosomes, FungalDiploidyGenetic MarkersGenome, FungalHomozygoteMutagenesis, InsertionalRNA EditingSaccharomycesThymidine KinaseGenetic MarkersThymidine Kinasegenome editingprototrophSaccharomycessynthetic biologythymidine kinase

Identifiers

PMID25209147
PMCPMC4224175
OpenAlexW2125758072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.