ReviewNeurocritical care2014
The International Multi-disciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring: future directions and emerging technologies.
Review in Neurocritical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of levetiracetam compared with phenytoin in prevention of seizures in brain injured patients: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Influence of Glycemic Control on Endogenous Circulating Ketone Concentrations in Adults Following Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2017Trial
- Electroencephalography in stroke Care: From acute monitoring to Post-Stroke epilepsy.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
- ICU-EEG Pattern Detection by a Convolutional Neural Network.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Causal inference for time series datasets with partially overlapping variables.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Focal brain cooling suppresses spreading depolarization and reduces endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression in rats.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- Seizures and Sepsis: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Current Status and Recommendations in Multimodal Neuromonitoring.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020Article
- Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: Review and recommendations of the COSBID research group.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017Review
- Invasive seizure monitoring in the critically-Ill brain injury patient: Current practices and a review of the literature.Seizure · 2016Review
- Brain Multimodality Monitoring: Updated Perspectives.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016Review
- Parameter Optimization for Selected Correlation Analysis of Intracranial Pathophysiology.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuromonitoring has evolved rapidly in recent years and there now are many new monitors that have revealed a great deal about the ongoing pathophysiology of brain injury and coma. Further evolution will include the consolidation of multi-modality monitoring (MMM), the development of next-generation informatics tools to identify complex physiologic events and decision support tools to permit targeted individualized care. In this review, we examine future directions and emerging technologies in neuromonitoring including: (1) device development, (2) what is the current limitation(s) of MMM in its present format(s), (3) what would improve the ability of MMM to enhance neurocritical care, and (4) how do we develop evidence for use of MMM?
Indexed as
Identifiers
25208681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.