Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25208670›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2014

Monitoring of brain and systemic oxygenation in neurocritical care patients.

Mauro Oddo, Julian Bösel, Participants in the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic role of quantitative pupillometry in traumatic brain injury: a scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Managing Intracranial Pressure Crisis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mauro OddoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, CHUV-Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland, mauro.oddo@chuv.ch.
Julian Bösel
Participants in the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring
Heidelberg University · USUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-013Medical Research Council G0001237Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G1002277Medical Research Council G9439390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of adequate oxygenation is a mainstay of intensive care, however, recommendations on the safety, accuracy, and the potential clinical utility of invasive and non-invasive tools to monitor brain and systemic oxygenation in neurocritical care are lacking. A literature search was conducted for English language articles describing bedside brain and systemic oxygen monitoring in neurocritical care patients from 1980 to August 2013. Imaging techniques e.g., PET are not considered. A total of 281 studies were included, the majority described patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). All tools for oxygen monitoring are safe. Parenchymal brain oxygen (PbtO2) monitoring is accurate to detect brain hypoxia, and it is recommended to titrate individual targets of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), ventilator parameters (PaCO2, PaO2), and transfusion, and to manage intracranial hypertension, in combination with ICP monitoring. SjvO2 is less accurate than PbtO2. Given limited data, NIRS is not recommended at present for adult patients who require neurocritical care. Systemic monitoring of oxygen (PaO2, SaO2, SpO2) and CO2 (PaCO2, end-tidal CO2) is recommended in patients who require neurocritical care.

Indexed as

Critical CareNeurophysiological MonitoringBrain InjuriesHumansIntracranial PressureOximetryPrognosisReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25208670
OpenAlexW2075129516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.