Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25208669›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2014

Monitoring of hematological and hemostatic parameters in neurocritical care patients.

Andrew M Naidech, Monisha A Kumar, Participants in the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Medication History versus Point-of-Care Platelet Activity Testing in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2018
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew M NaidechDepartments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA, a-naidech@northwestern.edu.
Monisha A Kumar
Participants in the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-013Medical Research Council G0001237Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G1002277Medical Research Council G9439390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anemia and bleeding are paramount concerns in neurocritical care and often relate to the severity of intracranial hemorrhage. Anemia is generally associated with worse outcomes, and efforts to minimize anemia through reduced volume of blood sampled are encouraged. Point-of-care-testing reliably detects the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that may worsen bleeding and reduce platelet activity, particularly in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. How best to monitor the effect of platelet transfusion or platelet-activating therapy is not well studied. For patients known to take novel oral anticoagulants, drug-specific coagulation tests before neurosurgical intervention are prudent.

Indexed as

Critical CareAnemiaBlood Coagulation TestsBrain InjuriesHemoglobinsHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesPatient SelectionPerioperative CarePoint-of-Care SystemsHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID25208669
OpenAlexW2019718856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.