Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25208664›Full record

ArticleJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A2014

The effect of tungstate nanoparticles on reactive oxygen species and cytotoxicity in raw 264.7 mouse monocyte macrophage cells.

Katherine M Dunnick, Melissa A Badding, Diane Schwegler-Berry, Jonathan M Patete, Christopher Koenigsmann, Stanislaus S Wong, Stephen S Leonard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tungsten toxicity and carcinogenesis.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Inhalation of Tungsten Metal Particulates Alters the Lung and Bone Microenvironments Following Acute Exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  6. Tungsten: an Emerging Toxicant, Alone or in Combination.Current environmental health reports · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine M Dunnicka National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, HELD , Morgantown , West Virginia , USA.
Melissa A Badding
Diane Schwegler-Berry
Jonathan M Patete
Christopher Koenigsmann
Stanislaus S Wong
Stephen S Leonard
State University of New York · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their unique size, surface area, and chemical characteristics, nanoparticles' use in consumer products has increased. However, the toxicity of nanoparticle (NP) exposure during the manufacturing process has not been fully assessed. Tungstate NP are used in numerous products, including but not limited to scintillator detectors and fluorescent lighting. As with many NP, no apparent toxicity studies have been completed with tungstate NP. The hypothesis that tungstate NP in vitro exposure results in reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and cytotoxicity was examined. Differences in toxicity based on tungstate NP size, shape (sphere vs. wire), and chemical characteristics were determined. RAW 264.7 mouse monocyte macrophages were exposed to tungstate NP, and ROS formation was assessed via electron spin resonance (ESR), and several assays including hydrogen peroxide, intracellular ROS, and Comet. Results showed ROS production induced by tungstate nanowire exposure, but this exposure did not result in oxidative DNA damage. Nanospheres showed neither ROS nor DNA damage following cellular exposure. Cells were exposed over 72 h to assess cytotoxicity using an MTT (tetrazolium compound) assay. Results showed that differences in cell death between wires and spheres occurred at 24 h but were minimal at both 48 and 72 h. The present results indicate that tungstate nanowires are more reactive and produce cell death within 24 h of exposure, whereas nanospheres are less reactive and did not produce cell death. Results suggest that differences in shape may affect reactivity. However, regardless of the differences in reactivity, in general both shapes produced mild ROS and resulted in minimal cell death at 48 and 72 h in RAW 264.7 cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaspase 3Caspase 7Cell LineComet AssayDNA DamageElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyHydrogen PeroxideMacrophagesMiceMonocytesNanoparticlesOxidative StressParticle SizeReactive Oxygen SpeciesTungsten CompoundsCasp3 protein, mouseCasp7 protein, mouseCaspase 3Caspase 7Hydrogen PeroxideReactive Oxygen SpeciestungstateTungsten Compounds

Identifiers

PMID25208664
PMCPMC4701033
OpenAlexW2057387365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.