Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25208076›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genomic and genotoxic responses to controlled weathered-oil exposures confirm and extend field studies on impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on native killifish.

Whitney Pilcher, Scott Miles, Song Tang, Greg Mayer, Andrew Whitehead

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A review of the toxicology of oil in vertebrates: what we have learned following theJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adaptive capabilities and fitness consequences associated with pollution exposure in fish.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Whitney PilcherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
Scott MilesDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
Song TangDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Greg MayerDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Andrew WhiteheadDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Louisiana State University · USTexas Tech University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the ecotoxicological impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, field studies provide a context for ecological realism but laboratory-based studies offer power for connecting biological effects with specific causes. As a complement to field studies, we characterized genome-wide gene expression responses of Gulf killifish (Fundulus grandis) to oil-contaminated waters in controlled laboratory exposures. Transcriptional responses to the highest concentrations of oiled water in the laboratory were predictive of field-observed responses that coincided with the timing and location of major oiling. The transcriptional response to the low concentration (∼ 10-fold lower than the high concentration) was distinct from the high concentration and was not predictive of major oiling in the field. The high concentration response was characterized by activation of the molecular signaling pathway that facilitates oil metabolism and oil toxicity. The high concentration also induced DNA damage. The low concentration invoked expression of genes that may support a compensatory response, including genes associated with regulation of transcription, cell cycle progression, RNA processing, DNA damage, and apoptosis. We conclude that the gene expression response detected in the field was a robust indicator of exposure to the toxic components of contaminating oil, that animals in the field were exposed to relatively high concentrations that are especially damaging to early life stages, and that such exposures can damage DNA.

Indexed as

DisastersEcotoxicologyGenomicsAnimalsDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, DrugFundulidaeMutagenicity TestsOrgan SpecificityPetroleumPetroleum PollutionTranscriptomePetroleum

Identifiers

PMID25208076
PMCPMC4160169
OpenAlexW1974928940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.