Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25207973›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Potential future impact of a partially effective HIV vaccine in a southern African setting.

Andrew N Phillips, Valentina Cambiano, Fumiyo Nakagawa, Deborah Ford, Jens D Lundgren, Edith Roset-Bahmanyar, François Roman, Thierry Van Effelterre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HIV infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. HIV, HCV and HBV: A Review of Parallels and Differences.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Preventing acquisition of HIV is the only path to an AIDS-free generation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew N PhillipsResearch Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Valentina CambianoResearch Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fumiyo NakagawaResearch Department of Infection & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Deborah FordInstitute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jens D LundgrenCHIP, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Edith Roset-BahmanyarGlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium.
François RomanGlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium.
Thierry Van EffelterreGlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium.
University College London · GBGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BERigshospitalet · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is important for public health and within the HIV vaccine development field to understand the potential population level impact of an HIV vaccine of partial efficacy--both in preventing infection and in reducing viral load in vaccinated individuals who become infected--in the context of a realistic future implementation scenario in resource limited settings.

methodsAn individual level model of HIV transmission, progression and the effect of antiretroviral therapy was used to predict the outcome to 2060 of introduction in 2025 of a partially effective vaccine with various combinations of efficacy characteristics, in the context of continued ART roll-out in southern Africa.

resultsIn the context of our base case epidemic (in 2015 HIV prevalence 28% and incidence 1.7 per 100 person years), a vaccine with only 30% preventative efficacy could make a substantial difference in the rate with which HIV incidence declines; the impact on incidence in relative terms is projected to increase over time, with a projected 67% lower HIV incidence in 2060 compared with no vaccine introduction. The projected mean decline in the general adult population death rate 2040-2060 is 11%. A vaccine with no prevention efficacy but which reduces viral load by 1 log is predicted to result in a modest (14%) reduction in HIV incidence and an 8% reduction in death rate in the general adult population (mean 2040-2060). These effects were broadly similar in multivariable uncertainty analysis.

interpretationIntroduction of a partially effective preventive HIV vaccine would make a substantial long-term impact on HIV epidemics in southern Africa, in addition to the effects of ART. Development of an HIV vaccine, even of relatively low apparent efficacy at the individual level, remains a critical global public health goal.

Indexed as

EpidemicsImmunization ProgramsModels, StatisticalAdultAfrica, SouthernAIDS VaccinesFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceVaccinationViral LoadAIDS Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25207973
PMCPMC4160197
OpenAlexW1980493639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.