Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25207942›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Modelling survival and mortality risk to 15 years of age for a national cohort of children with serious congenital heart defects diagnosed in infancy.

Rachel L Knowles, Catherine Bull, Christopher Wren, Angela Wade, Harvey Goldstein, Carol Dezateux, UKCSCHD (UK Collaborative Study of Congenital Heart Defects) collaborators

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Prerepair Mortality in Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Retrospective Analysis of Early Childhood Deaths.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel L KnowlesPopulation Policy and Practice Programme, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine BullCardiac Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher WrenDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Angela WadePopulation Policy and Practice Programme, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Harvey GoldsteinPopulation Policy and Practice Programme, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carol DezateuxPopulation Policy and Practice Programme, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
UKCSCHD (UK Collaborative Study of Congenital Heart Defects) collaborators

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/02/065/13934Medical Research Council G04005546Medical Research Council G106/1083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital heart defects (CHDs) are a significant cause of death in infancy. Although contemporary management ensures that 80% of affected children reach adulthood, post-infant mortality and factors associated with death during childhood are not well-characterised. Using data from a UK-wide multicentre birth cohort of children with serious CHDs, we observed survival and investigated independent predictors of mortality up to age 15 years.

methodsData were extracted retrospectively from hospital records and death certificates of 3,897 children (57% boys) in a prospectively identified cohort, born 1992-1995 with CHDs requiring intervention or resulting in death before age one year. A discrete-time survival model accounted for time-varying predictors; hazards ratios were estimated for mortality. Incomplete data were addressed through multilevel multiple imputation.

findingsBy age 15 years, 932 children had died; 144 died without any procedure. Survival to one year was 79.8% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 78.5, 81.1%) and to 15 years was 71.7% (63.9, 73.4%), with variation by cardiac diagnosis. Importantly, 20% of cohort deaths occurred after age one year. Models using imputed data (including all children from birth) demonstrated higher mortality risk as independently associated with cardiac diagnosis, female sex, preterm birth, having additional cardiac defects or non-cardiac malformations. In models excluding children who had no procedure, additional predictors of higher mortality were younger age at first procedure, lower weight or height, longer cardiopulmonary bypass or circulatory arrest duration, and peri-procedural complications; non-cardiac malformations were no longer significant.

interpretationWe confirm the high mortality risk associated with CHDs in the first year of life and demonstrate an important persisting risk of death throughout childhood. Late mortality may be underestimated by procedure-based audit focusing on shorter-term surgical outcomes. National monitoring systems should emphasise the importance of routinely capturing longer-term survival and exploring the mechanisms of mortality risk in children with serious CHDs.

Indexed as

AdolescentCause of DeathChildChild MortalityChild, PreschoolFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantInfant MortalityMaleModels, StatisticalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25207942
PMCPMC4160226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.